It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aphorism
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I respectfully disagree. Enlightenment is not the destination, but the path to it. It is a process and not a product.
Not the destination but the path to it? Path to what? The path to the path? Either way, that's quite the profound paradox.
I get the feeling you're deliberately not understanding, because it doesn't get simpler than what I just explained.
AfterInfinity
Aphorism
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I respectfully disagree. Enlightenment is not the destination, but the path to it. It is a process and not a product.
Not the destination but the path to it? Path to what? The path to the path? Either way, that's quite the profound paradox.
I get the feeling you're deliberately not understanding, because it doesn't get simpler than what I just explained.
AfterInfinity
Serdgiam
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I always thought it pointed towards the idea that nothing you "do" changes, only the way you look at it. Most also view "enlightenment" as some sort of end-goal, and is even specifically in that way in some sects. Others teach that it is more of a return to baseline. More of a starting point than the endgoal.
Ironically, there is rarely a grey area. I say ironically because of the inclusion of many different non-duality teachings.
I have always thought that the idea of selfish/selfless isnt quite as straightforward either. For someone that defines the "self" as something they are an inherent part of, everything is "self." So, such a person acts, in their perspective, in the most selfish way imaginable and yet it appears to others as purely selfless.
Not the destination, but the path to it.
Aphorism
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I get the feeling you're deliberately not understanding, because it doesn't get simpler than what I just explained.
That's true. But the way you wrote it is paradoxical.
Aphorism
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I get the feeling you're deliberately not understanding, because it doesn't get simpler than what I just explained.
That's true. But the way you wrote it is paradoxical.
Aphorism
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I wasn't trying to be rude. I understood completely what you meant. For someone who posts so much you're quite difficult to converse with.
Aphorism
For someone who posts so much you're quite difficult to converse with.
AfterInfinity
So what conclusions have we reached as a result of this thread?
Stormdancer777
AfterInfinity
So what conclusions have we reached as a result of this thread?
none of us are enlightened?
Serdgiam
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Or all of us are..
And here we are, just chopping wood and carrying water.edit on 9-1-2014 by Serdgiam because: (no reason given)
AfterInfinity
Stormdancer777
AfterInfinity
So what conclusions have we reached as a result of this thread?
none of us are enlightened?
But according to most generic definitions of the term, we're certainly working on it.
So what conclusions have we reached as a result of this thread?
Aphorism
reply to post by AfterInfinity
So what conclusions have we reached as a result of this thread?
All one has to do is put the word "God" in the title of the thread to bring out the usual dogmatists.