It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aphorism
reply to post by Itisnowagain
If the word god appears to exist does it have to have a book for it to appear in?
The word god appears in what?
Spinoza reckons the whole world (including thought and words) appears in God.
Yes. But we call that the universe now. Same thing, better name.
Aphorism
Plainly stated, since God is only ever found within books, art, rhetoric and from various forms of human expression—indeed, we cannot know about God any other way—we must assume that this is as what, as where, and as how, God exists. This subject we can deny or have an opinion about; this character we pray to; this character we refuse to contemplate. From what we can confirm, it exists as a word in its fundamental form. All talk about God is talk about this word.
Itisnowagain
Your grandfather was an appearance that has now ceased to be
- but that which knows the appearance will never cease.
Notice that which appears cannot be held onto. Things come and go. Can you even hold on to a thought, make it not move/change to another thought?
Notice that the one that is seeing/knowing the appearance never goes away - never goes anywhere, never changes.
edit on 8-1-2014 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Itisnowagain
Who's god?
There is only God and things appear and disappear in God.
Buttonlip
Random words that mean nothing do so little for the argument you want to make.
en.wikipedia.org...
French philosopher Martial Guéroult suggested the term "Panentheism", rather than "Pantheism" to describe Spinoza’s view of the relation between God and the world. The world is not God, but it is, in a strong sense, "in" God. Not only do finite things have God as their cause; they cannot be conceived without God.
Itisnowagain
No doubt they appear to be random words also.
Buttonlip
Itisnowagain
No doubt they appear to be random words also.
Not at all. What you quoted makes sense. What you posted is just gibberish.
Buttonlip
Itisnowagain
No doubt they appear to be random words also.
What you quoted makes sense.
The world is not God, but it is, in a strong sense, "in" God. Not only do finite things have God as their cause; they cannot be conceived without God.
I don't think very much that wasn't fairly obvious was developed in the first post. You are simply assigning all non-null ontological states the quality of existence. For instance, you basically just declared that all concepts exist, but that doesn't get us very far in argument. If someone asked, "do unicorns exist?", and I replied, "yes, the concept exists", we haven't really made any ground outside of stating the obvious. Anyone can see that concepts exist, but the person was interested in whether the unicorn happened to be more than simply a concept.
No one asks whether a deity exists, and is asking about the existence of the concept. Most people would not be pleased if they called up a retail store asking if they had a certain item in stock, and then arrived to find that although that item wasn't there per se, the concept of the item existed. That was clearly not what the concern was, and pointing out that concepts exist didn't advance anyone's interests that day.
Also, it is a minor quibble, but biblical sources are not the only place a deity is found; there are literally hundreds of religions and philosophies that incorporate a deity; it doesn't make sense to single out only one source, especially when that source is itself based on earlier sources. This doesn't advance the argument that a deity exists so much, but it is a critical point. You don't have to dismiss merely the christian god, you have to dismiss all possible deities if your interest is in proving one doesn't exist.
Agnostic atheism, also called atheistic agnosticism, is a philosophical position that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Agnostic atheists are atheistic because they do not hold a belief in the existence of any deity and agnostic because they claim that the existence of a deity is either unknowable in principle or currently unknown in fact. The agnostic atheist may be contrasted with the agnostic theist, who believes that one or more deities exist but claims that the existence or nonexistence of such is unknown or cannot be known.[1][2][3]
Aphorism
reply to post by spy66
Scripture is all written based on inspiration; said to be the Word of God. Jesus walked the Earth to forfill scripture. How can any of us prove a inspiration physically to you? That is something you must find within Your self. There are other ways to prove to Your self that God exists. But that would demand some Scientific understanding from Your part. You could start With asking Your self if the infinite exists. Either it does or it dosent. If you Accept it. How did the infinite form finite existance when the infinite is a absolute constant? I can Challenge you on this, but i know you will reject the fact in the end, because you wouldnt understand. Because you are already proving it, that you dont. edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Who says divine inspiration is the word of god? Only the people who wrote the bible and the people who claim the bible is the word of God. You're taking someone else's words as the word of god; that sounds almost blasphemous to me. But I know you'd reject that because you wouldn't understand.