It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The JFK Assassination---The Roles of Masons and Royalists---50 years is long enough

page: 20
10
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 01:54 PM
link   

AugustusMasonicus

boymonkey74
Are the masons anything to do with the Knights Templar?.


Yes, they helped us kill Kennedy. They were pushing to use a mace but we convinced them that a high powered rifle might work better.


Well, I did suggest water balloons but ooooooooh no, you guys just "had to be different"...




posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 02:09 PM
link   

MagnumOpus
reply to post by boymonkey74
 


There appeared to have been a big one tied to Jack the Ripper, where women of the sex trade had their organs cut out with surgical precision. Such duty for the Queen. imho


You don't actually know anything about this, do you? Thought not.



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 02:19 PM
link   
Its Official Mason News!


Ronald Reagan presented with Honored title of MASON by Nine of his Brother Masons!! imho

February 11, 1988, Masonic officials with President Ronald W. Reagan in the Oval Office of the White House.

Reagan honored and conferred the title of Scottish Rite Mason by his Mason Brothers!

Got Photo of the Momentus event when Reagan joined the Crooks Club. imho

wonderful Reagan photo
edit on 9-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: The most infamous group to take over a country from within. imho



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 02:22 PM
link   

MagnumOpus


wonderful photo


You mean the picture that proves that Reagan was an HONORARY Mason? Keep up Maggers, at least try to read other people's posts!



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 02:26 PM
link   
Its official---Reagan can be called by the Ttile MASON. imho

He got blessed by Nine Masons to be titled MASON.


It really doesn't mean much if he skipped the silly nonsense on threatening to cut each other's throats, or stick a sword through another brother's heart to show Brotherly Love among Masons. All that is a bunch of bunk nonsense.

Plus, them Masons discriminate against former slaves. imho


Yeah, Reagan is a MASON

Title Ceremony



Yeah, Mason Reagan thanked his Brothers for "the framed certificate of membership," and said he was "honored to join the ranks of sixteen former Presidents in their association with Freemasonry."

Its all right and proper that Reagan has Mason Membership and title of MASON.
edit on 9-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

I found that stuff early yesterday, just before my post saying that maybe Reagan thought he was a Mason but what he didn't know is that he couldn't have gotten into a meeting. He would have been barred from meetings. I think I'm Anne Hathaway's boyfriend, but if I tried to approach her and hug her I'd be thrown to the floor by two strong bodyguards. Same thing. Remember, Reagan was in the midst of dementia about the time of the ceremony, and probably thought he was Ming the Merciless (which comes closer to describing him than the term "Mason").



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 03:38 PM
link   

MagnumOpus
Its official---Reagan can be called by the Ttile MASON. imho

He got blessed by Nine Masons to be titled MASON.


It really doesn't mean much if he skipped the silly nonsense on threatening to cut each other's throats, or stick a sword through another brother's heart to show Brotherly Love among Masons. All that is a bunch of bunk nonsense.

Plus, them Masons discriminate against former slaves. imho


Yeah, Reagan is a MASON

Title Ceremony



Yeah, Mason Reagan thanked his Brothers for "the framed certificate of membership," and said he was "honored to join the ranks of sixteen former Presidents in their association with Freemasonry."

Its all right and proper that Reagan has Mason Membership and title of MASON.
edit on 9-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: (no reason given)


(Facepalm) You really, really don't understand this stuff very well do you? Shall we start using shorter words for you?



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 03:39 PM
link   

noonebutme

AugustusMasonicus

boymonkey74
Are the masons anything to do with the Knights Templar?.


Yes, they helped us kill Kennedy. They were pushing to use a mace but we convinced them that a high powered rifle might work better.


Well, I did suggest water balloons but ooooooooh no, you guys just "had to be different"...


Wait, I thought that I suggested the aggressive use of cake?



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Remember I am not a Mason and I don't agree to your rules, and when it says that Reagan has been working with the Masons for a long time and he gets a Certificate that titles him a Mason, and then Reagan says thanks for the membership.

Then Reagan is a Mason-----and I don't care about going to silly meetings and Mason non-sense. There exists a working relationship between Reagan and the Masons that titled him Mason.


It goes beyond your simple games of having to go to meetings, put on dumb shows for the new indoctrination types, and all that Jaz.

Your elects made Reagan a Mason, complete with certificate of title.


Nobody cares about Reagan going to dumb meetings or other Mason nonsense that wastes time and is all about hazing, violations of persons, and getting Mafia like codes to kill them. Reagan skipped all that crap and went straight to the top.

edit on 9-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:05 PM
link   

MagnumOpus
Remember I am not a Mason and I don't agree to your rules, and when it says that Reagan has been working with the Masons for a long time and he gets a Certificate that titles him a Mason, and then Reagan says thanks for the membership.

Then Reagan is a Mason-----and I don't care about going to silly meetings and Mason non-sense. There exists a working relationship between Reagan and the Masons that titled him Mason.


It goes beyond your simple games of having to go to meetings, put on dumb shows for the new indoctrination types, and all that Jaz.

Your elects made Reagan a Mason, complete with certificate of title.


Nobody cares about Reagan going to dumb meetings or other Mason nonsense that wastes time and is all about hazing, violations of persons, and getting Mafia like codes to kill them. Reagan skipped all that crap and went straight to the top.

edit on 9-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: (no reason given)


Got you. Condemned out of your own mouth. Or rather keyboard. So you've just admitted that Reagan was an honorary Mason, didn't believe in any Masonic principles, just taking the honorary title. There's no going to the top on this, he just became an honorary Mason.
Case closed. Job done. Mods, please lock this thread? The OP has just put his foot in it big time and is too misguided to admit his mistake.



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:09 PM
link   
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
 


Lol It is just too funny to close



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:18 PM
link   
Now----some further interesting issues per Bush and Reagan. Reagan turned down the Ford Mason Control of his office. Then Reagan gains another Secret Society type Bush, who appears connected enough to get Reagan killed and take over the Presidency. imho

Method looks just like the Masons game against JFK to plug in Mason LBJ.

Then it appears Reagan also suspects Bush accomplices tried to knock him off.

Very Interesting-----the Reagan appears to decided he needs to become a Mason! Starts plugging Masons into office. imho


Source:
Reagan shot two months into term





Cleon Skousen spoke with Reagan at the convention, both before and after the Bush decision, and related how Reagan told how Kissinger and Ford with the support of Walter Cronkite coerced him. According to Skousen these are Reagan's very words "They showed me the brush by which I would be tarred if I did not go along." After the election, when George Bush's top man, campaign manager James Baker, became Reagan's chief of staff -- the one person who controlled who saw the president -- the betrayal of conservatism was complete.

-------------

In the period when Reagan came in, I believe Bush took over. He was vice president and rose to power, I believe, on March 31 1981 when Reagan was nearly assassinated. The person placed as the patsy, not the person that actually shot Reagan but the person placed as the patsy in the case, was John Hinckley. His family ties were to oil. Through that oil connection, Neil Bush -- George Herbert Walker Bush's son, who worked in oil -- knew Scott Hinckley who also worked in oil. Neil had been involved with Scott in many oil operations -- both working for oil speculation and oil companies.

--------------

Then, after Reagan got himself to George Washington Hospital despite attempts to bring him to the Bethesda Naval Base, Michael Gilson De Lemos, author and member of the National Committee of the US Libertarian Party, picks up the story, writing on January 20, 2002:
When Reagan was shot, he apparently assumed that his Vice President did it. How do I know this? From the fascinating information that my mother, who volunteered at the hospital where he was taken and was a friend of his from the old Hollywood days, shared with me. It seems that shortly after he woke up, he asked for a DC patrol officer, had this person find a US ship that had just reached the area, and soon sailors with sidearms guarded his bedside while he placed the whole hospital under his direct command and swore all to secrecy. They buffered him from the Secret Service and anyone else. He trusted no one—and perhaps, by protecting himself with unentangled sailors and officers fresh from sea, saved his own life, and the country from one more black mark of shame.






edit on 9-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: Reagan's Payola for the Masons



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by MagnumOpus
 


Infowars as a source?



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:27 PM
link   
Now some interesting issues between the Kennedys and Reagan. Plus a lot of the loaded dodge stories on the RFK and JFK hit, that appear to be information seeding to hide the real killers trails. imho


Source:

Reagan and Kennedy interactions




RFK was shot in Governor Reagan’s state. Reagan was no stranger to Bobby Kennedy. He had debated him a year earlier on national television, which didn’t go well for RFK, with Reagan clearly outshining him. Kennedy told his handlers to never again put him on the same stage with “that son-of-a-b----.”

---------------

That debate occurred five years after Bobby Kennedy had intervened to get Reagan fired from his long stint as host of the top-rated GE Theatre on CBS—a fact unknown until it was revealed by Michael Reagan in his excellent book, The New Reagan Revolution.

------------

But particularly interesting was how Reagan unflinchingly pointed a finger of blame in the direction of Moscow. Reagan noted that Kennedy’s killer, Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian Arab and also a communist, had shot Kennedy because of his support of Israel during the Six Day War that had occurred exactly one year earlier. On that, we now know beyond dispute what Reagan knew then: That war had been shamelessly provoked by the Kremlin.

-------------

But Reagan wasn’t finished positioning blame where it deserved to be placed. Eight days later, on July 13, 1968, Reagan delivered a forgotten speech in Indianapolis. Both the Indianapolis News and Indianapolis Star reported on Reagan’s remarks, but the only full transcript I’ve seen was likewise located in Bill Clark’s private papers. In that speech, Reagan leveled this charge at international communism, with an earlier Kennedy assassination in mind: “Five years ago, a president was murdered by one who renounced his American citizenship to embrace the godless philosophy of communism, and it was communist violence he brought to our land. The shattering sound of his shots were still ringing in our ears when a policy decision was made to play down his communist attachment lest we provoke the Soviet Union.”





posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:33 PM
link   
reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

The Queen is not the global Freemason leader, no such person or position exists.



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:42 PM
link   

KSigMason
reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

The Queen is not the global Freemason leader, no such person or position exists.


Hush, don't bring facts into this!



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:42 PM
link   
reply to post by boymonkey74
 

There's Missionary Mondays (an oldy, but goody), Tantric Tuesdays, Wheelbarrow Wednesdays, Throne Thursdays, Freaky Fridays, Standing Dragon Saturdays, and Sunday Funday. lol

reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

And this is where you are wrong. The certificate did not confer the title of Mason nor does the Scottish Rite have that authority. Having an honorary certificate did not bestow any of the rights and privileges of membership.

Yes, the fact you can't prove he was a member of the Lodges is important.



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:47 PM
link   
reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

Farrakhan is a nutjob and extremist. Honestly, who cares what that dbag thinks?

That is not what the Hiramic legend is about.

reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

Liar. JFK never spoke about the Masons nor did he have any plans to prohibit their meeting nor could he as that would be a violation of our 1st Amendment rights.

No one cares about your opinion as it is not indicative of reality. We Masons are not trying to become god or replace religion. Quit with the lying, it's just getting sad now.


Everyone knows the Masons by their actions that proceed them.

Charity?

Plus, your video is not showing the entire speech of JFK. In fact, prior to that "repugnant" statement, JFK said that there needs to be more or greater secrecy.
edit on 9-1-2014 by KSigMason because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

There's no fact to Masonic involvement with the assassination of JFK. Nor is that what the Hiramic legend is about so quit with your revisionist bull# and conjecture.

reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

Fascists like you are hilarious. You speak out of necessity which is a common cry of a tyrant. It's hilarious that you presume to speak for all the People when anti-Masons are but a tiny annoying minority.

Coincidences turn into Conspiracies when all inconvenient information is ignored.

reply to post by MagnumOpus
 

Actually truth is the first lesson taught in Freemasonry nor is meeting in private wrong or immoral. I don't get why you are trying to make secrecy or, rather, privacy taboo or a criminal act. It's a natural human behavior and everyone practices it.



posted on Jan, 9 2014 @ 06:04 PM
link   
A Even more telling bet of LBJ on Death in office for reason to become VP:


Source:

LBJ gambles his life on JFK's death





The Texan gambler who bet his life on JFK's death - and won
THE YEARS OF LYNDON JOHNSON VOLUME 4: THE PASSAGE OF POWER BY ROBERT A CARO

-----------

He looked up the history of the office. Seven VPs had become president through the death of the man in office - five among the last 18 presidents. The odds were better than four to one. He took the offer. ‘I’m a gamblin’ man, darlin’,’ he said to his companion on the way to the new president’s inaugural ball.
He was gambling on the one heartbeat separating him from the top. The gamble came off on November 22, 1963.





So, it might be interesting to see how many VP Masons landed in office after their President got shot! imho



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join