It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The thing is, with this topic in particular as well as some others it is just a no go zone and you will get stonewalled, even if you had something solid to put forward the agenda will smother it.
PlanetXisHERE
So you are saying that it is strange for a person to ask a hypothetical question? Such as......."If God did exist"......or........."if Aliens exist"..............or "If I won the lottery"..........
People deal in hypothetical situations everyday and the ability to have an interesting discussion about hypotheticals is not predicated by people's beliefs about them.
Your premise logically boils down to it is impossible to have a conversation about something unless the truth is known, and if that were the case people would not be able to discuss such things as history, science ...........kind of ridiculous thus what would be termed as a "fallacy".
network dude
PlanetXisHERE
So you are saying that it is strange for a person to ask a hypothetical question? Such as......."If God did exist"......or........."if Aliens exist"..............or "If I won the lottery"..........
People deal in hypothetical situations everyday and the ability to have an interesting discussion about hypotheticals is not predicated by people's beliefs about them.
Your premise logically boils down to it is impossible to have a conversation about something unless the truth is known, and if that were the case people would not be able to discuss such things as history, science ...........kind of ridiculous thus what would be termed as a "fallacy".
Oh, so we are not saying chemtrails are real, just a "what if they were".
Sure, as long as that's clear, it's all good. No harm in speculating. It's when you start to talk as if you have no doubt they are real and then have nothing other than "look up man" to back that up, that your premise starts to fail.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
I am challenging you here and now to explain why they would do this. No, don't try to attach proof that they are . Tell me in your own words why they would. If you can provide a logical reason why anyone would execute a plan to destroy the planet or its citizens then we can move on to your proof that they are doing it but first there has to be a reason. A logical reason.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
[Your premise logically boils down to it is impossible to have a conversation about something unless the truth is known, and if that were the case people would not be able to discuss such things as history, science ...........kind of ridiculous thus what would be termed as a "fallacy". ]
Except that the truth or at least most of the truth is known in history or science. Those are credible disciplines with years of knowledge behind them . Unless your wish is to discredit all of history and science. In which case... carry on dude.
So my OP was an attempt to discuss weather/climate extremes that may or may not be related to chemtrails/contrails, and discuss the premise in the OP as either reality or a hypothetical depending on where you sat on the chemtrail/contrail fence, but leave the chemtral/contrail debate behind, for it has been discussed in thousands of threads/posts, amply, for any who wanted information on either side of the debate, and just discuss my premise that a ramp up in chemtrails has seen North America at least go from record heat to record cold in just 18 months.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
I am challenging you here and now to explain why they would do this. No, don't try to attach proof that they are . Tell me in your own words why they would. If you can provide a logical reason why anyone would execute a plan to destroy the planet or its citizens then we can move on to your proof that they are doing it but first there has to be a reason. A logical reason.
DJW001
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
So my OP was an attempt to discuss weather/climate extremes that may or may not be related to chemtrails/contrails, and discuss the premise in the OP as either reality or a hypothetical depending on where you sat on the chemtrail/contrail fence, but leave the chemtral/contrail debate behind, for it has been discussed in thousands of threads/posts, amply, for any who wanted information on either side of the debate, and just discuss my premise that a ramp up in chemtrails has seen North America at least go from record heat to record cold in just 18 months.
Once again you are back-pedaling so fast you're stripping your gears. You want to discuss the effects of "chemtrails" without discussing what they are or whether or not they even exist! Then you post data suggesting that mean global temperature has been increasing steadily since the 1940s (the invention of the jet engine) then suggest that the purpose of "chemtrails" is to cool the planet... and that its working!
So you are saying that it is strange for a person to ask a hypothetical question? Such as......."If God did exist"......or........."if Aliens exist"..............or "If I won the lottery"..........
People deal in hypothetical situations everyday and the ability to have an interesting discussion about hypotheticals is not predicated by people's beliefs about them.
Your premise logically boils down to it is impossible to have a conversation about something unless the truth is known, and if that were the case people would not be able to discuss such things as history, science ...........kind of ridiculous thus what would be termed as a "fallacy".
All im saying is its plausible
I am not sure exactly what you are looking for with this statement because it seems to me to be saying "Don't answer unless you agree with me".