reply to post by Xeven
Who says He hasnt already? Your'e sayin"....
You: "...it's existence obvious..."
You: "...obvious manner"
This is funny. Those words and standards are not everyone's.
*You expect existence to be "proven" by some means of your choosing, certainly not necessarily the right one or one that may be anything other than
what YOU stated here. What about the rest of the world and theirs? Maybe it already HAS been "proven"?
"Communicate" is a relative word meaning a lot of different things to different people as to what it is, and to what would be a universally accepted
method by the entire world of different religions, languages, politics and levels of understanding, comprehension and education.
"Obvious manner?" Would you expect the skies to open up and rays and beams of golden light to stream down as trumpets sound? Whats obvious? You mean
to you or the entire planet all at once?
Think about it.
In just this thread title, you have put a lot of preconceived terms to be accepted and "proven"...Maybe the skies will darken and thunder and
lightening and wind come down with screaming crowd voices yelling, screaming and crying like in a horror movie "I am your GOD!", not the other way
around. You'd have to accept that. But this thread title alone that would make it unacceptable.
Point: I know youre wanting people's individual ideas but there is no universally accepted and comprehended means of understanding, recognition, and
method of verification mutual to all persons, races, creeds etc.
1. "existence obvious" -By what standards?
2. "communicate"-By what universally acceptable method?
3. "obvious manner"-Lightning? Trumpets? Video conference? Email?
See my point here? Ill never believe there will be only one way to prove "obvious existence", to "communicate" nor in any "obvious manner(s)" that
will apply to all.
edit on 09-22-2013 by mysterioustranger because: ck