It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
Of course I do not trust what a state senator says, however it does make a lot of sense that some of the most powerful and wealthiest corporations would have the most to loose if disclosure were to happen, hence the cover up. I used to assume it was because the impact on religion, especially the Christians in the US. However the financial and power motivation seems plausible.
The evidence for contact is out there if you know where to look.
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
If they are here and it was made public big oil would be over!
I have always thought our leap in technology since the 1940's is one of the biggest pieces of evidence for ETs.
We are slowly getting fed technology that we have got from ETs.
The cover up is NOT energy related.
It is military related.
If I can create cheap little drones that look like foo fighters by the hundreds, I can fly them over enemy positions and use them as chaff.
The added bonus is giving them radar signatures and then being able to project holograms onto them.
This is heavy duty tech.
What Alice is trying to say is that Big Oil would transform itself into Big Fusion, or Big Antimatter, or Big Zero Point or Big Quarks or Big Higgs Bosons or Big Black Holes or whatever "they" would use to power their stuff.
It's naive to think global corporations such as them would sit around twiddling their thumbs, stuck on stupid while the world around them changed.
General Electric for example made the transition from the steam era to the oil era to the nuclear era without missing a beat.
Why wouldn't they transition to the alien tech era?
reply to post by 1ofthe9
I'm not quite sure I am understanding what your saying friend.
can you paraphrase that again.
To rebuttle: or however you spell that. Your saying that 500,000+ people that stampede that area would have no effect regardless of the outcome?
I'm a bit lost on this.. BTW this Caribou Whiskey is great!
ADDED:You might actually get a return on your investment. Easier to sell to shareholders.
Please elaborate. I'm just a stupid college edumacated construction workeredit on 31-12-2013 by AK907ICECOLD because: added questionedit on 31-12-2013 by AK907ICECOLD because: (no reason given)
They meet with a man who has a picture of a UFO he took one night while out in the desert. After having the picture analyzed by a professional, the conclusion is, it's real.
They also meet with a former Senator (I forget the state) who talks about his knowledge of the cover-up inside the government concerning UFOs. And he tells WHY they are covering it up.
Then there is a man toward the end of the video that provides documented PROOF by the government talking about their involvement with the UFOs, and their using the ones that crashed to do reverse engineering on them.
All of a sudden valves are replaced by circuit boards
and fiber optics is discovered.
Both are pretty significant leaps in technology in the 50's I think.
Solar Cells were invented that decade.
The HYDROGEN BOMB was invented that decade.
The friggin MICROCHIP was invented in that decade.
The computer modem.....invented in that decade.
Those things above are NOT just progressions from inventions in the 40's.
You can't claim that the MICROCHIP is a normal progression from the vacuum tubed computers invented a decade prior.
The Hydrogen bomb is not a natural progression from the Atom Bomb invented a decade earlier, both use completely different science.
What was the natural progression of the Laser? There wasn't one.
I also find your above response about Optic Fiber to be very misleading.
You've proved me wrong before, and I'll await your response.