It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
stevcolx
reply to post by doorhandle
I can see hundreds and thousands of stars from my house. But on the Apollo and Chinese Moon landings? Where are the Stars?
Makes you wonder why people see a Conspiracy? Are the landings a cleverly planned Hoax? Surely not. They can't be. The evidence for them being real is there!
WHERE????????
stevcolx
reply to post by Imagewerx
And the blast craters?
reply to post by stevcolx
How Is Pressure Relevant? — The Crux of Debunking This Claim
First, some numbers: The lunar module (LM) descent stage engine had a maximum thrust of 9870 ft-lb, but this was throttleable back to a minimum of 1050 ft-lb. Sounds like a lot. But, the diameter of the nozzle was 63 inches, which is an area of about 3120 in2. Dividing this into the force (thrust) and you have a pressure range of 0.4-3.2 ft-lb/in2, otherwise known as psi. This is equivalent to the metric 2760-22,100 N/m2. But let’s stick with psi.
Anyone who owns a car probably knows that this is already significantly less than your tire pressure … by a factor of 10-100. When Apollo 11 landed, the thrust was down to about 1/3 of max, so down to around 1 psi.
Now let’s look at the average adult footstep: The average non-American weighs around 150 lbs. The average human footprint is around 50 in2 (don’t believe me? do the math yourself!). Divide the first into the second and you have the average human footstep exerting a simple 3 psi.
This is 3x larger than Apollo’s engines!!
The very fact that the astronauts walking on the moon did not create “blast craters” underneath them should be explanation enough as to why the engine did not create a blast crater under it — the pressure was simply too low.
stevcolx
reply to post by Imagewerx
I take it then the Chinese Lander is exactly the same as the Apollo one which would explain the no blast crater and no stars in the photos!
stevcolx
reply to post by Imagewerx
Well if the Moon Landings are real and photos are real it begs the question why they don't take pictures to include the stars. The shuttle missions did and look at all the UFO's they captured. If the landings are real then it's a good bet they took the pictures at those settings to block out UFO's!
NASA: What's there? Mission Control calling Apollo 11...
Apollo: These "Babies" are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there, lined up on the far side of the crater edge! They're on the Moon watching us!
I can see hundreds and thousands of stars from my house.
Lol you are a debunker. ATS has a lot of people that are debunkers, AKA fake debunkers! They go about using Bull# data debunking what people say!
India's first lunar mission has captured images of the landing site of the Apollo 15 craft, debunking theories that the US mission was a hoax, the country's state-run space agency said Wednesday.
Don't know. I'm discussing the possibility. Compiling evidence to confirm or deny either way. This is what we do in ATS. Someone's perspective is different from others!