It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Woodcarver
reply to post by Logarock
So your reasoning is that you dont understand how evolution works and because science disagrees with the bible.
That is all you got?
Logarock
reply to [url= by Prezbo369[/url]
Dude try reading or rather comprehending. I am all for science and have not defended the opposite opinion.
What you are doing is trying to defend your lovely evolution ideas from science, so you muddy the waters by dragging in the church. Are the church a bunch of scientists? We are talking science here. Science is challenging the ape man stupidity here not the church.
You must be having a hard time dealing with the fact that science is no longer being friendly to your ape man mythology. Of course the church will cheer them on. You may have to deal with that aspect without letting it cloud your acceptance of modern scientific conclusions.
Logarock
Woodcarver
reply to post by Logarock
So your reasoning is that you dont understand how evolution works and because science disagrees with the bible.
That is all you got?
If that is your deduction from what I said then you just prove the case. Evolution will never be able to demonstrate an evolution of the intellect and spirit of man, which are the higher questions, through genetic science. They don't even claim this as a goal or claim an explanation exists in a genetic solution to the question.
So birds at one time had claws.......oh wow that's really going to answer the more pressing questions. Questions like how has man emerged as primary earth spices when even science and geology show that all serious competitors were wiped out by catastrophic destructive events.
"Can you give an example of a genetic mutation or evolutionary process that seem to increase the information in the genome?"
Woodcarver
reply to post by Logarock
You are moving into troll territory.
The true nature of man is his genetic code.
Explain for us just what you think genetic code is?edit on 3-1-2014 by Woodcarver because: (no reason given)
Woodcarver
reply to post by boniknik
Sheesh there are millions of examples of fossilized skeletons that clearly show the changes of fingers into wings, arms into fins, scales into feathers, teeth into beaks, brain size expanding, bones in hands changing for better manipulation of tools.
It is claimed that the universe is 13.8 billion years old. Our planet 4.54 billion years old. And the total atoms in existence in this universe is about 10^80. Yet the probability of a protein forming is about 1 in 10^150 and DNA is about 1 in 10^39970. How are these numbers possible in a universe that's only 13.8 billion years old? It's like winning the powerball EVERY SINGLE day for thousands and thousands of years.
DNA carries information in a very computer-like way, and we can measure the genome’s capacity in bits too, if we wish. DNA doesn’t use a binary code, but a quaternary one. Whereas the unit of information in the computer is a 1 or a 0, the unit in DNA can be T, A, C or G. If I tell you that a particular location in a DNA sequence is a T, how much information is conveyed from me to you? Begin by measuring the prior uncertainty. How many possibilities are open before the message “T” arrives? Four. How many possibilities remain after it has arrived? One. So you might think the information transferred is four bits, but actually it is two. Here’s why (assuming that the four letters are equally probable, like the four suits in a pack of cards). Remember that Shannon’s metric is concerned with the most economical way of conveying the message. Think of it as the number of yes/no questions that you’d have to ask in order to narrow down to certainty, from an initial uncertainty of four possibilities, assuming that you planned your questions in the most economical way. “Is the mystery letter before D in the alphabet?” No. That narrows it down to T or G, and now we need only one more question to clinch it. So, by this method of measuring, each “letter” of the DNA has an information capacity of 2 bits.
Shannon’s formula becomes a slightly more elaborate weighted average, but it is essentially similar. By the way, Shannon’s weighted average is the same formula as physicists have used, since the nineteenth century, for entropy. The point has interesting implications but I shall not pursue them here.
Willtell
Its too fine tuned to be random
If you hear the examples you would be convinced
Brotherman
reply to post by AfterInfinity
Evolution:
Evolution consists of changes in the heritable traits of a population of organisms as successive generations replace one another. It is populations of organisms that evolve, not individual organisms.
www.nas.edu...
Thats strange this definition looks quite a bit different
Evolution: Evolution consists of changes in the heritable traits of a population of organisms as successive generations replace one another. It is populations of organisms that evolve, not individual organisms.
reply to post by Revolution9
I really do think that Darwin's Theory of Evolution is practically debunked by modern Science. There are so many holes in it and it cannot explain itself under modern scientific scrutiny.
I really do think that Darwin's Theory of Evolution is practically debunked by modern Science.
I think you are exaggerating with your conclusion here. I would argue that we don't KNOW it happens.
We know that species adapt and can see that the strongest survive.
We certainly do not know that species diversify enough to change their numbers of chromosomes to form entirely new species. To say that we do know is not scientific because we do not know.
We have NO record of an adaptation. That is not true either.
Adaptation:
The adjustment or changes in behavior, physiology, and structure of an organism to become more suited to an environment.
Evolution may sometimes happen so fast that it's hard to catch in action, a new study of Galápagos finches suggests.
Researchers from New Jersey's Princeton University have observed a species of finch in Ecuador's Galápagos Islands that evolved to have a smaller beak within a mere two decades.
Surprisingly, most of the shift happened within just one generation, the scientists say.
In 1982 the large ground finch arrived on the tiny Galápagos island of Daphne, just east of the island of San Salvador.
Since then the medium ground finch, a long-time Daphne resident, has evolved to have a smaller beak—apparently as a result of direct competition with the larger bird for food.
You have completely ignored the Science of DNA here that is central to proving Darwin's Theory. Only when we can locate this mechanism (which has to be there if Darwin is to be PROVEN correct) can we view Darwin's Theory as a scientific fact.