It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did you read the Tim Printy analysis I posted back on page 2, the first time you posted that? I'll re-post it here:
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Do you care to take a shot at this video?
UFOs? Are you talking about the oil well fires?
home.comcast.net...edit on 27-12-2013 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
If you aimed a video camera at a plane, and made it out of focus, why wouldn't it look just like that?
This is part of the famous Derbyshire video series. This video, for me, defies explanation unless someone can better explain what it is that's flying past the moon.
Do you care to take a shot at this video? It's authentic, in the sense it came from the Mexican Govt... These 11 objects were caught on infrared cameras.
That's what Maussan would like you to believe, but he's a well-known hoaxer.
It's not oil well fires... These were seen at 10,500 ft in the air.
THE AN/APS 143B(V) RADAR DOES NOT PROVIDE ALTITUDES OF MOVING TARGETS SO THEY COULD HAVE BEEN MISTAKEN AS FLYING OBJECTS WHILE DETECTED AT GROUND LEVEL
December NARCAP update: In late October 2004, NARCAP did amplify on how their invesitgations had progressed. They seemed fairly convinced that the oil well hypothesis was the correct answer to the event and congratulated Captain Franz for his work.
1. There are no flickering/changing shapes of the lights
2. The objects appeared in front of clouds and could not be distant
3. The FLIR did not have the range to see the oil well fires
4. The camera was not pointing in the right direction
5. The angle of elevation was too high for oil well fires
I know the debunker theory, I just don't believe it one bit
reply to post by roncoallstar
Hi roncoalistar, good thread by you but unfortunately you chose the wrong video for
your proposal, it`s a hoax. A CGI hoax created by a certain individual named Brian Bessent
in 2005 to attract new subscribers to his pay per view website UFO Theatre. Bessent sent
the CGI video to Jeff Rense to be published as big headline wich Rense did. The footage
was attacked as clear CGI but Rense defended Bessent just to find out later that it was
all a hoax and the story ended in a big scandal that even took Bessent to jail for beating
up his former girlfriend in Phoenix. A very disturbed guy Brian Bessent disappeared forever
as well as his UFO Theatre website.
Read the complete story discussed here in 2005:
And here is the hoax exposed and final conclusion:
edit on 27-12-2013 by free_spirit because: (no reason given)
Also, STS-114 UFO incident is a crazy clip in itself... NASA video shows white orb @ 2:18 mark come into frame from the right stop and then reverse. What in space can do that? Most things in space travel in straight lines and don't stop.
You haven't seen this video yet?
reply to post by roncoallstar
mine are the most convincing to me
and here's a tutorial on concave objects
reply to post by JimOberg
absolutely will and thx for the link...ive always loved this video and am open to new ideas on it no matter what the outcome...thx