It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rendlesham Forest…, A Christmas Story from 1980 - Can We ‘Let it Be’?

page: 163
87
<< 160  161  162    164  165  166 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman






So I guess only time will tell on this one


There are still a few hours left for the grand reveal!





posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 10:14 AM
link   
For those who are following along re John Burroughs and his revealing of David Rochon.

It appears a book is been written which will include the David Rochon saga.

Of course "A code within a code " is mentioned.

Here is part of what has been said by John Burroughs.





As far as David Rochan goes I did give the person who I know was directly involved till midnight to explain what went on. I plan on going into full detail in the book on what took place and how I found out about it. What I will say for now is this. It was someone who was close to the incident who created the fictitious charter David Rochan using someone who was working for homeland security to be the INTERMEDIARY That person who created Rochon claimed they eventually lost control of interaction that was taking place because a outside agency became involved and locked them out of the conversation.


I already knew that Rochon would not appear, there was no chance of that occurring.
I wonder when John decided to include Rochon in his pending book.

5 minutes past midnight?








posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Baablacksheep

Well if Larry, Jim (to be confirmed) and Chuck have enjoyed their day in paperback being centre of the story then why not John as well?

About this Rochon character. Is he Rochan or Rochon? And if he worked for Homeland Security why is he interfering in a case that happened on UK territory? The Department of Homeland Security was not formed until 2003 in the wake of 9/11. It's primary function to protect the sovereignty of the USA, its people and infrastructure against external threats. So what exactly is the link there? The story was over 23 years old by then.


Oh........... I'll have to buy the book won't I


I've already began to negotiate for the movie rights though!






posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman


www.youtube.com...

My info is David Rochon or Dave Rochon MM

Brilliant poster !






posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 03:15 PM
link   
It could even be 'Rochen', if one screenshot is genuine. Curious as to why that one is different.



"A code within a code"

Just when you think a duck or two might line up, we must ask ourselves, why do more appear in the pond?

The more that are added, surely the greater the duck poo. This water is messy.

Things are no longer transparent.


Brilliant as always MM. "Preserving the Status Quo" -- spot on I think!


edit on WedAmerica/ChicagofWed, 02 Aug 2017 15:17:15 -0500pm308America/Chicago831 by Defragmentor because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 03:25 PM
link   


It could even be 'Rochen', if one screenshot is genuine. Curious as to why that one is different.
a reply to: Defragmentor

Can you show the screenshot Defragmentor


edit on 2-8-2017 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 03:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep


It could even be 'Rochen', if one screenshot is genuine. Curious as to why that one is different.
a reply to: Defragmentor

Can you show the screenshot Defragmentor



It's this one:
image.ibb.co...

Keep up the good work



posted on Aug, 2 2017 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Defragmentor

Very interesting !



posted on Aug, 5 2017 @ 05:29 AM
link   
Didn’t this mysterious Dave Rochon have the same IP address as Jim Penniston..? Seems pretty obvious who he is in that case.

Jim wants to be believed. That’s why he probably added one special coordinate to the ones he lifted from sacred-destinations.com: The Sedona, Arizona coordinate. I bet this was the place where John had a strange encounter with some lights, as John told in one of his recent interviews.



posted on Aug, 5 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Guest101



Didn’t this mysterious Dave Rochon have the same IP address as Jim Penniston..?


So Dave Rochon (or however it's spelled) had access to the same computer that Jim used for his electronic communications? Meaning chances are it was Jim? Probably the same computer used to find co-ordinates all over the globe from a sacred website as well?

So we did have "Rochon all over the world" after all.

Now from a totally cynical position. If they ever do make a Hollywood movie on the RFI then I would guess that there is a belief that the witness with the most interesting story stands the best chance of becoming a 'consultant'. This possibly explains the regular narrative expansions by some of the players. But who 'jumped the shark' first?



I even think this film production company would be perfect

There is way too much manure in that forest leading to things growing out of control.



posted on Aug, 5 2017 @ 12:13 PM
link   


Didn’t this mysterious Dave Rochon have the same IP address as Jim Penniston..? Seems pretty obvious who he is in that case.
a reply to: Guest101


The person who made that claim has provided no evidence to support the claim made.

Until that occurs. Innocent until proven guilty.



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 03:22 AM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

The person who made claim Rochon was Penniston
was an individual by the name of EL Oso.

There has been no real evidence to come out of that
but that is the one who made that particular
claim. If that individual could provide the evidence
to support it.

Then it becomes interesting .



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 06:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Baablacksheep

I was referring to this.



[1:] Ronnie Dugdale did write and tell me that Dave Kelly told him that Dave Rochon was Jim Penniston.[...]
[2:] El Oso was the one who came to me to tell me David Rochon was Jim.[...]
[3:] His IP address had been traced or so it was claimed.[...]
[4:] Halt did tell me not to rule out Jim been Rochon or someone associated. I have that in black and white.



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 06:07 AM
link   
All of that would be correct 101.

However El Oso has not provided hard evidence
to support the claim. If that can be demonstrated
then it goes with what other people have thought
etc and is an entirely different matter.



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 06:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Baablacksheep




The person who made claim Rochon was Penniston was an individual by the name of EL Oso.


El Oso now?

'The Russian bear is in the woods somewhere.....'





Yet another character hiding among the trees in the forest.
Can you or anyone shed further light on who this Rochon and El Oso might be?



More importantly what part do they play in the RFI?

Or will I have to buy a book to find out?



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 06:41 AM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

You are killing me with these comments and pictures!

No idea who El Oso is. He crawled out the woodwork
at a time when Rochon was active and wanted it known
that Rochon was Jim.

April 2016 El Oso was on Nick Popes page.
He asked him if Halt still checked his email.

Rochon often commented on the 81st Justice site.

I have no idea who Rochon is either, other than what
people claim. John is the one now about to write about him
so I guess we shall have to buy the book (Not so definitive).


My understanding he was closely involved and even perhaps
behind it in some way. (RFI)





edit on 6-8-2017 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 09:29 AM
link   
This might be of interest to some.

It is not the original from Rochon.

John clearly wanted it on his page when he saw the
original.

www.facebook.com...



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 06:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
Rochon often commented on the 81st Justice site.


If Rochon commented on a website that either Dave Kelly or El Oso had log or database access to (or they requested this information through the administrator), they would be in a position to know that IP address. Didn't Dave run or host a website for Penniston? He would likely know Jim's IP address and be in a position to compare them, or do some form of /tracert on them.

There do appear however (at least to me) to be some clear grammatical differences between Rochon and Penniston's writing. There's also almost a French lilt to some of Rochon's word usage "seriouse", "advantagouse".

But in this saga, the games played still seem to be many, and anything is possible.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Defragmentor

What I'd like to know is if either of these characters "The Bear (Oso)" or "The Polariser (Rochon)" are actually that important to the case? Or is it yet more pollution being dumped in the forest?



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 11:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
This might be of interest to some.

It is not the original from Rochon.

John clearly wanted it on his page when he saw the
original.

www.facebook.com...


Dave Rochon appears to be a person who:

- Seems to hate Larry Warren (calling him a ‘useful idiot’).

- Does not like Nick Pope, either (Nick was always very reluctant about the binary codes).

- Thinks, however, that Jim’s inconsistencies are just ‘minor things’.

- Makes spelling mistakes that are typical for a native speaker. (”refers too as .. there mission”)

- Likes to give the impression he has exclusive access to secret information.

- Promises revelations that will blow everyone away, but does not deliver.

- Likes to play mystery games.

- Makes a big deal of Jim’s ‘Total Recall’.

- Tries to convince Burroughs that he, Jim, and Halt are in this together by suggesting they all have been ‘messed with’ (though both John and Halt have always denied anything like that happened to them).

So it’s just a matter of finding someone who fits this profile…



new topics

top topics



 
87
<< 160  161  162    164  165  166 >>

log in

join