It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
..... I remember Dr Green writing that the number of people on the entire planet who had seen the research he was talking about was maybe 8 or so, and he was one of the 8 so there were 7 others....
The RF is identified in a dozen classified and a half-dozen unclassified studies on cardiological and neurological injuries ... not thousands of reports. Very, very few physicians even care about this arcane area of research...and fewer know about the injuries sustained by near-field (< 100 M) to humans. The data is sparse, it is not properly Peer-reviewed, it is not understood, it is not the subject of current research. And that is the truth. T
You didn't show the powers he [Geller] displayed on the Johnny Carson show (Uri Geller segment starts at 2 minutes).
Thanks, but it's inconvenient for much of the global audience to do that.
Does the national archives normally digitize the records and make them available for download after a period of time? Or does some citizen have to go to Kew, copy the documents, then scan the copies and post those, or is it even legal to do that?
Anyway if someone can help me find the appendix F Linda Howe mentions with reference to Rendlesham, I'd appreciate it, unless she's got her wires crossed.
LT COLONEL HALT: Bit like a pupil of an eye lookin' at you, winking. And the flash is so bright to the star scope, that err... it almost burns your eye
Burroughs, 2009: ”I was held up for a while but was allowed out in the area and that is where I met up with Halts party.”
“I was told by Halt when I met up with them that something landed the third night and by Bustinza also.”
”He never said what landed just something landed he then pointed up in the sky and showed me the blue lights that were flying around. As we watched them that’s when we saw one of them beam lights inside the [weapons] storage area and the radio traffic went nuts.”
”I was with Halt and we could see the beams of light going down into the [weapons storage] area and we could hear everything going on inside the area as it was happening. We couldn’t see the area but we could see the lights going down in the area and could hear what was going on. ”
John Burroughs, old Rendlesham forum, somewhere around 2009 (before the 30th anniversary conference)
Nevels, 2010: ”So when we went out to the edge where there was a farmer’s field - Lt Colonel Halt and I were mainly the leaders, we were in front – and we looked out and saw this object that was sitting over in the farmer’s field about 200 yards away. To me it looked kind of yellowish orange like very hot, and it looked like it was on fire, burning. And every once in a while I would see something shoot off that looked like molten metal. Colonel Halt and I both observed that and we watched it.
So we jumped the fence and as we jumped the fence it disappeared. What we saw was so fast and it disappeared. We were in awe about where did it go? What did it do? And I looked up and saw the lights and I told Col. Halt, ‘Sir, the lights are up above us.’
There was very rapid movement. No sound whatsoever! All the cattle in the field quieted down. It was just as still - an eerie feeling because it was very quiet.
The lights would disappear and be gone in a blink. You could blink your eye and look up and they would be gone. Then RAF Bentwaters would announce on their radio back to us, ‘We see it, sir! We see it! It's over us!’
Then when the light disappeared from their side (about 4 miles away), we immediately were able to say, ‘Here it is!’ In other words, it was like it was instantaneous from there to where we were
Those beams that came down looked like very faint laser beams. They were pencil-thin. We could see it against the black sky. When we looked out and saw those pencil-thin beams, I told Col. Halt, ‘I believe that something is trying to tap into what we've got’.
Source: Nevels, Earthfiles interview, 2010
Since any reference to ‘Weapons Storage Area’ could have led to embarrassing questions, this part of the tape was edited out.
originally posted by: mirageman
As for other news it seems that some of the UFO files (with redactions) that were on hold due to the General Election here in the UK have now been released. Well they have publicly.
...
But you need to visit the National Archives Centre in Kew to view them at present.
....the Rendlesham "incident" has become a quagmire of petty egos which I've long found it best to simply avoid. Many of those involved in the relevant events have hindered, apparently deliberately, any proper examination of what happened
Anyway, Linda Howe mentioned the Condign report having an appendix F relating to Rendlesham. I downloaded the full Condign report from the national archives, 460 pages and haven't found the appendix F she refers to, has anybody seen it?
How says in the 460 page report, appendix F, difficult to find but available on earthfiles, mentions "mental effects", "as in the Rendlesham Incident" .
"...inside the doctors notes, the nursing notes, the specialist's note are a myriad of references to Special Access Projects and the names of OTHER "adjacent and ancillary Programs and projects that can not be disentangled, and which could uncover active and recent projects unrelated to Rendlesham. The reasons are not necessarily related to Rendlesham...and not all the connections relate to Rendlesham."
Source : www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Thanks for the quotes Isaac. It's nice to see some tidbits of info even if the full documents aren't readily accessible to everyone yet.
The 25 Working Papers appear to be based on extremely limited
research. Most of the 25 "Working Papers" only cite one or two
items in support. Indeed, few of those articles actually relate
to the central contentions in the Condign Report and are in fact
at most of peripheral relevance.
On an initial review of the Condign Report, the key Working
Papers appear to be the first and last ones, i.e.: (a) Working
Paper 1 (particularly Annex D and (especially) Annex F) in
relation to UAP effects on humans and objects. (b) Working Paper
25 on magnetic field effects on humans.
...
After reading over 100 pages of material, the reader is finally
rewarded with a comment on a specific well known case. That
comment relates to the best known recent British UFO case, the
Rendlesham Forest incident. The MOD's file on the incident has
been released to the public and is available on its website.
That incident has been discussed in dozens of books (by skeptics
and pro-ETHers) and has been the subject of several complete
books. The relevant comment (in full) from the Condign Report is
as follows "The well-reported Rendlesham Forest/Bentwaters event
is an example where it might be postulated that several
observers were probably exposed to UAP radiation for longer than
normal UAP sighting periods. There may be other cases which
remain unreported. It is clear that the recipients of these
effects are not aware that their behaviour/perception of what
they are observing is being modified" (Volume 2, Working Paper
1, Annex F, page F-4, para 13).
.......the "new" UK UFO files also contain a memo from 1994 which discusses possible disinformation involving UFOs (apparently by the Russians, but the redactions in the relevant document are more extensive than normal so it is difficult to be sure). The same document also refers to a publication relating to high power particle beams as "a useful reference work".....
Thank you Isaac for taking a brief break from UFOlogy retirement to share some more information!
originally posted by: IsaacKoi
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Thanks for the quotes Isaac. It's nice to see some tidbits of info even if the full documents aren't readily accessible to everyone yet.
Another tidbit from the "new" UK UFO files... "Sec (AS)2 acts as a 'front' for MOD ...".
Good luck with that, I hope it bears fruit!
(I think I have to continue to refrain from posting the full pages due to Crown Copyright issues, but I'm continuing some dialogue with a manager at the National Archives in the hope that the material can all be made freely available online).
I wouldn't over-estimate the significance of a statement which begins "It might be postulated that...."
Annex F to Working Paper 1. Indeed, I highlighted that material as particularly significan to the reasoning and content of the Condign Report.
Further lessening the credibility of this postulation for me reference to the so-called "landing site" which doesn't seem like such a credible postulate based on the evidence for it I've reviewed. I did agree with your comments completely about the Condign report that the author seemed to be out of touch with other, apparently more extensive research on the same topic of plasma phenomena, very odd.
....I have given the theory of MM some thought and there is one element that doesn’t seem to fit: The police were called on the first night and again the next morning.
If this was an accident or experiment that was covered up with a UFO story afterwards, the calls to the police right on the first night/morning do not fit in.
...Performing dangerous experiments on British soil close to a nuclear base armed to the teeth without even informing the people in command? That seems rather adventurous...