Well, you people want proofs for what I have claimed, maybe a website that contains such text? I am already the webmaster of a successful aviation
website and could have added a lot over there and directed you. But the thing is, internet it self at times not very reliable, so forget Pravda, I m
skeptic of most websites out there.
I have said in the very begining that this is just a theory that I am propogating. I would just like to make a few statements to those who have been
on stiff denial of it.
As a matter of fact, we don't have a proof for maximum scientific claims. Can you prove me that the earth is made up of a molten lava core? How deep
have we dug till date? Thats only 13KM that too in Kola Peninsula. Have you had any proof of the Black Holes when they were first proposed? But how we
prove it is using some other proven facts...
We tend to carefully listen what Stephen Hawkin says in his speeches (although most of it could be termed BS since there is no proof at all... and
that guy Stephen tends to disregard his own theories some time later) but we listen and take it for granted. Most do, because that is exactly what you
want to hear. About the ends of the universe, time etc. But when you hear of a civilization with scientific advancements, you don't want to believe
and try to find excuses. The reason is that it is not something you were expecting, not something that you wanted to know about.
The debris and stuff...
I don't believe that anything would have been left of Hiroshima or Nagasaki if it was left as it is for another 200 years... you wouldn't see a
single darn sign that anything existed. About the nuclear evidence, I think we learned it in schools that Mohen Jodaro was dead 5000 years back. Do
you expect to find radioactive remains after thousands of years? And as a matter of fact, Discovery channel did say in its episodes that radioactive
remains were found.
Slashpepper,
The vedas and ancient shastras have come down to us vocally, we know this very well, and it was documented later. That is in the so called IRon Age.
Vedas have passed among the ages vocally by the survivors of the armageddon.
Apart from that, i wonder how much the scientific community has been able to solve of the Egyptian Pyramids, or the indian architectures. We have the
Iron Pillar in New Delhi, which hasn't caught rust for hundreds of years, whereas samples show that it is made of crude iron(wrought iron)...
Today's science can't explain the science of recent past... leave alone that of a civilization thousands of years back.
I also agree this theory is a bit far fetched. If a civilization was advanced enough to produce nuclear weapons, then they sure as heck had the
technology to transport themselves out of harms way. I believe we would see evidence of their culture on different continents, not just limited to the
Indus region. Somebody would have left something around, only to be discovered later. If we are in the nuclear age, and we have the technology to
discover and dig up ancient cities, they would have had the same technology to try and protect theirs.
AH! and what made the Japanese not run from Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the crime of the century was committed? They had ships and air balloons.
Well, obviously it happened without any warning. Enemy attacks without warning.
There is no evidence of the sudden disappearance of the Atlantis, Mohen Jodaro, Harrappa etc.
There must have had happened something more than just a natural calamity.
Can anyone explain me how could the people existing 1000s of years back having 'no scientific knowledge' could describe the effects of a Nuclear
explosion? The weapon called the 'Brahmastra' was the most deadly weapon of the time. Although time tells that it was used only once and caused a
devastation never seen before. The description of such nuclear weapons are also found in the Atlantis civilization.
Again what in the world would cause an 'early science fiction writer' think that the flying chariots which were cigar shaped were driven on a bright
ray of light and made a sound of roaring thunder? I don't hear such accurate description of a rockets even in the fairy tails.
Now to make another interesting point, Indians were the first in recent times to INVENT THE EARLY ROCKETS.
If you go and check some good book on rocketry, the king of Mysore, Tipu Sultan used rockets against the british in war. The british had been speaking
of killing indians like flies before the battle, and when they came in, they faced the nightmare of their life. Apparently Tipu Sultan wanted to keep
this rocket technology secret. But unfortunately after he lost the war, this rocket tech of his was also lost... no other king after him was heard of
using this.
www.daviddarling.info... (just for intro)
www.tippusultan.net...
And radionucleides decay, all right, but any nuclear explosion leaves isotopes hanging around some of which have half-lives measured in
thousands of years.
And how many years back did Mohen Jodaro exist? thousands of years ain't it?
Most of you yourself tell that some advanced kind of things are being discovered as remains of a civilization thousands of years back... but those
things get ridiculed by the society as 'some kind of junk'. I do believe that the previous civilization was not supposedly very good at
semiconductors (electronics industry) since no such descriptions are found, but the fact is apparent that they had excellent knowledge of chemistry,
quantum physics and astrology.
Anyway, another thing... Suppose Mahabharata is science-fiction. But the Dwarika, the city of Krishna, was recently discovered at the exact
coordinates specified in the Mahabharata. Dwarika has been found under the sea, you can please search on it. Its considered the next great
archeological discovery after Troy.
Anyway can anyone please tell me why people here believe that the ancient civilizations couldn't be scientifically advanced? Not being able to find
its traces is not an excuse... can i have an intelligent reason?
[edit on 21-11-2004 by CaptainRon]