It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
We have additional issues where the material is cloned just for protein manufacture where the resulting "Jesus Meat" could then be used for anything from communion Wafers, Hamburgers, Tacos, Sausage, Jiggley Jello, any other meat by-product or maybe even Condoms.
AliceBleachWhite
On a personal note: I personally don't think the Jesus Character even existed as a real person.
I personally think the Jesus character is an amalgamation of the Buddha as well as other figures of the time which would have been convenient vehicles for the perpetuation of a prophecy fulfillment event.
By extension, a Jesus foreskin would thus be impossible, but, for those that actually DO take stock in this mythology, the whole foreskin question, and faith in such a thing, to them, could very well be an important issue.
ashtonhz8907
Sorry I was referring to this bit. I doubt that we have his foreskin and if we do I think it is a fake. I'm just saying for the standard of the time Jesus had his life remarkably documented while most are Christian sources there are others as well, including great Roman historians of the 1st century. He was more so documented than many of his contemporaries. I find it silly to debate whether he existed. I think it is pretty much a historical fact at this point, where the debate is are the many inconsistencies and contradictions. As you said he may have been a convenient vehicle for other's propaganda but as a physical human he did exist. In other words I'm saying the man existed the ideology of the man is what is at question. Back to the foreskin though, I doubt it exist and if it did I doubt there will be Jesus meat or anything soon. I doubt there would be cloning especially by any true Christians but heh with the world we live in today anything is possible.edit on 12/25/2013 by ashtonhz8907 because: (no reason given)
ashtonhz8907
reply to post by ashtonhz8907
To add further thought to my previous post I meant to clarify if the Catholic Church retains ownership they would not clone it even if the means became available. Smaller fanatical religions might want to but they would not posses the funds to do so. The only real issue would be some rich fanatic getting ahold of it. Otherwise what I'm saying is in the Church's hands there will be nothing to see. I doubt it was lost or stollen though and more likely hidden for being a forgery.
AliceBleachWhite
ashtonhz8907
reply to post by ashtonhz8907
To add further thought to my previous post I meant to clarify if the Catholic Church retains ownership they would not clone it even if the means became available. Smaller fanatical religions might want to but they would not posses the funds to do so. The only real issue would be some rich fanatic getting ahold of it. Otherwise what I'm saying is in the Church's hands there will be nothing to see. I doubt it was lost or stollen though and more likely hidden for being a forgery.
It was stolen before. It can be stolen again, and it's not the only relic associated with the Christ Character that could potentially have retrievable DNA which in turn could then potentially be cloned toward whatever purpose.
AliceBleachWhite
reply to post by Snsoc
Certainly. Yet, someone will pay $10,000 for some toast on ebay because it might possibly maybe could be if one squints perceived to resemble at least a little bit, a potential shape that might look like Mary.
Now take that same kind of fetishism, and make Jesus Clones.
Jesus clones could be Male, or, even Female.
Consider parts of the world where prostitution is legal, and then, consider someone slimey enough to make a Female Jesus Clone, raise it in isolation specifically for the purpose of eventually pimping it out to the Prostitution circuit.
Consider the same with a Male Jesus clone pimped out to high-end Homosexual Prostitution.
We're all quite familiar with the degeneracy of Catholic Priests in what sorts of things they get up to with altar boys. What if they had access to Jesus Clones?
It could be argued the Jesus Clones are "property" of the Church, and can thus be dispensed with and used by the Church in whatever way or means, even up to including Live Crucifixions the like of which some people volunteer for and carry out even now.
Filipinos reenact Crucifixion with real Nails!
Consider, as stated before, the types of people that would just clone the Jesus Protein and make cloned Jesus Meat. Communion and the "body" of Christ could take on a whole new meaning for some cult.
An enterprising Fast Food Chain could have Jesus Burgers.
The depravity and Fetish attachment to just the idea of a genetic attachment to the Christ Character could and would result in far more disgusting acts than these.
Clone an Army of Jesus babies. Who's going to shoot at them?
edit on 12/25/2013 by AliceBleachWhite because: (no reason given)
defcon5
According to Jewish law, just like blood, it would have been buried in the ground.
A lot of those old religious relics were nothing but hoaxes used to generate money for churches, or to go into the collections of rich nobles.