It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
maus80
beezzer
reply to post by CranialSponge
What "gray area" did Phil Robertson breach?
What is your answer, you crazy Canadian?
How about the part in his contract where he won't make his network want to fire him? You can believe with 100% certainty that that is part of the contract.
If I made a contract with you, that if I didn't drop the F-bomb for a week, you'd give me a million bucks, and then I said the F word into a loudspeaker outside of your bedroom...well I should still get my million bucks, because free speech right? I know you'll answer with "I'd never sign that contract" or "I don't have a million" and just let the example go right out the window. Don't bother.
daskakik
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
You know you have asked the same question a few times in at least 2 threads.
A restriction that a person willfully agrees to creates the grey area, that you keep trying to say doesn't exist.edit on 22-12-2013 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
maus80
reply to post by beezzer
See you can't address breach of contract being different from breaking a law and being prosecuted, and you can't admit that you are wrong.
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
maus80
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
Ok, well people are not free to call in bomb threats. Doing so WILL lead to prosecution. Therefor there is a restriction on free speech, it has been impeded and negated. You no longer have any reason to continue this argument, or care, because you have your answer. Absolute free speech DOES NOT EXIST, PERIOD.
If it is harmful to others or impedes on their freedoms then yes.
beezzer
maus80
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
Ok, well people are not free to call in bomb threats. Doing so WILL lead to prosecution. Therefor there is a restriction on free speech, it has been impeded and negated. You no longer have any reason to continue this argument, or care, because you have your answer. Absolute free speech DOES NOT EXIST, PERIOD.
So you agree that opinions are worth banning.
If it is harmful to others or impedes on their freedoms then yes.
Thanks for your input.
beezzer
maus80
beezzer
Why won't people answer the question?
Either we have a freedom of speech or we don't.
Any restriction impedes that freedom and negates it.
Ok, well people are not free to call in bomb threats. Doing so WILL lead to prosecution. Therefor there is a restriction on free speech, it has been impeded and negated. You no longer have any reason to continue this argument, or care, because you have your answer. Absolute free speech DOES NOT EXIST, PERIOD.
So you agree that opinions are worth banning.
Thanks for your input.
beezzer
reply to post by CranialSponge
I actually have a crush on your avatar *blush*
Simple question though. And I didn't ask about hate speech which is entirely different.
Just free speech.
beezzer
Should people be punished for freely expressing themselves?