The Black Pope strikes his first blow.

page: 3
5
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 01:47 AM
link   
reply to post by EricD
 


1.) He is a Jesuit, he is the top Jesuit because he is also the Pope.
2.) As I said earlier, all Roman Catholics are subservient to the Pope.
3.) This is the first time in history that a Jesuit, is now the Pope.
4.) please return to 1.)

I suppose the only other person that could clear this derailment of my thread, would be the Pope.
Back on track.
He has terminated several priests for maintaining the true beliefs in Christianity.




posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 



1.) He is a Jesuit, he is the top Jesuit because he is also the Pope.

For about the tenth time, he is not the Superior General of the Jesuits because he is the Pope, and the derogatory title "Black Pope" is attached to the Superior General, not the "top Jesuit", whatever that means.

If the whole of your argument hangs on Francis being the Black Pope, then your entire thread is a big fail. If it does not, I would suggest taking a different tact, because the people who actually know something about the subject are unanimous in their refutation of your claim.

As for your complaint that he is dismissing priests who maintain "true beliefs in Christianity", here is a Bishop that Francis removed from office and sent to a monastery: Vatican suspends German 'Bishop of Bling', and I think Jesus would concur in canning that guy. Bishop Tebartz-van Elst was removed because he was acting in a non-Christian manner, and I expect you to provide evidence for your claim, showing that these priests were removed because they had "true beliefs in Christianity", not for some other reason.

I presume that we could agree that a priest who refused John Kerry communion, and who also molested children, should be removed from the priesthood, though it would be for the latter reason, not the former (and, since you seem to have trouble understanding some things, I will be clear in stating that I do not think that person was removed because he molested children.)



posted on Dec, 29 2013 @ 12:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


No one is trolling your thread except for you. Its a fact we are all living in SIN everyday...Now I am not Catholic so unfamiliar with the system of belief. It seems you would attempt to educate instead of attempting to force a dogma that is flawed. I am not the most religious person but raised in the Baptist church which many Baptist believe that all Catholics are going to you know where simply because of some of the rituals.

Myself, I find God to be an understanding fellow...we speak the same language so to speak....he does his thing and I do mine and allow others to do their thing. I for one am not prepared to judge anyone's belief system be they Muslim or any other of the hundreds of religions out there so why you as a Catholic insist on passing judgement on the leader of your church simply because of the order he was a part of is just....welll SIN...so instead of judging others (SIN) then perhaps you should accept church doctrine as handed down by a church leader...if not then perhaps you should become a Baptist instead.





new topics
 
5
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join