posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 08:01 AM
reply to post by Violater1
1.) He is a Jesuit, he is the top Jesuit because he is also the Pope.
For about the tenth time, he is not the Superior General of the Jesuits because he is the Pope, and the derogatory title "Black Pope" is attached to
the Superior General, not the "top Jesuit", whatever that means.
If the whole of your argument hangs on Francis being the Black Pope, then your entire thread is a big fail. If it does not, I would suggest taking a
different tact, because the people who actually know something about the subject are unanimous in their refutation of your claim.
As for your complaint that he is dismissing priests who maintain "true beliefs in Christianity", here is a Bishop that Francis removed from office
and sent to a monastery: Vatican suspends
German 'Bishop of Bling'
, and I think Jesus would concur in canning that guy. Bishop Tebartz-van Elst was removed because he was acting in
a non-Christian manner
, and I expect you to provide evidence for your claim, showing that these priests were removed because they had "true
beliefs in Christianity"
, not for some other reason.
I presume that we could agree that a priest who refused John Kerry communion, and who also molested children, should be removed from the priesthood,
though it would be for the latter reason, not the former (and, since you seem to have trouble understanding some things, I will be clear in stating
that I do not think that person was removed because he molested children.)