I was watching a YouTube video (I can't find it again now) where some scientist was trying to show that we are not entirely dependent on the blank
slate argument (which means that our behaviors are dictated by cultural norms).
Psychiatrists and scientists at the time had remarked that there was a risk in saying that our behaviors were genetically based, in that it could
cause another eugenics movement like the Nazis in the 1930's.
The truth of the matter is that there are
genetic components that determine the neurological basis for our behaviors. That's scientific fact.
An autistic person is not going to be able to act the same as a non-autistic person.
And believe it or not, or like or not, a male is not
going to be able to act the same as a female, period, due to genetic differences
resulting in differences in neurological structures in the brain, you can even check it out
here on Web MD.
However, there certainly seem to be a fair share of movements out there like feminist extremists, for example, who are not simply satisfied with
getting equal representation in the workplace, but want to change men's behavior to something that is simply unrealistic to expect.
What's going to happen when men in general have to meet expectations that are unrealistic? They won't be able to meet them, and are going to have to
drop out of the work force, for starters, and they won't be able to meet the expectations in the dating pool, either -
And that's just the most simple example. But here, let me lay out how genetic eugenics is happening right now in the U.S., mostly through the
liberal atheist agenda.
1. Regardless of the evidence of neurological setbacks, there still seems to be a prevalent idea that people's behavior can be modified
2. Apparently, because of wanting to avoid a eugenics movement, a lot of scientists were against admitting to neurology corresponding to behavior in
the 70's, and that probably influenced a lot of political movements that are still around today.
3. Because the political movements are not taking into account the neurological reality, they are pushing for unrealistic standards in human behavior,
and when people aren't meeting them, punishing them.
4. This results in genetic eugenics because the people who cannot meet the behavioral standards are either sent to prison, or fired from work, or cut
out of the political arena, or who knows what.
5. This creates a genetic liberal elite. Just like the Nazis. And who knows what the next step is in the eugenics program they are offering today.
There is a very real
risk that with drones and totalitarian surveillance, it could become impossible to meet the expectations of the Elite,
And and trust me, when that happens, the old saying "If you aren't doing something wrong, you don't have to worry about it" will become total bull#
and outdated. This danger is real, and it happening now.
It is never okay to punish someone for something that they don't have the power to change, it is never okay to judge someone for something they do not
have the power to change, and society that engages in that behavior becomes dangerous to live in as it becomes literally impossible to meet its
You might be able to meet the expectations for the moment, but you more than likely will not down the line, if the society continues to become more
and more ridiculous in its expectations of intelligence, behavior and the like.
Most of you reading this have no chance in hell of making it to a safe spot in this game of King of the Hill.
Because look, anyone who thinks they are safe now are only
safe until the people below them on the social ladder are knocked out of the system,
then there will be a new set of unrealistic standards that cannot be met, and a new set of people knocked out.
If only 10% of the people in the current society are knocked out per year -
Year One: 25 million out of 250 million (population of the U.S.) 225 million left.
Year Two: 22 million knocked out of 225 million (203 million left).
Year Three: 20 million knocked out of 203 million (180 million left).
What about a 30% intolerance rate?
Year One: 75 million knocked out of 250 million, 175 million left.
Year Two: More than 50 million knocked out of 175 million, 125 million left.
Year Three: More than 25 million knocked out of 125 million, less than 95 million left.
By year three, over half the population of the U.S. has been rendered mute through Eugenics. Whether or not this is through death, or being
incarcerated in the prison system or possibly the mental health system,
Or being put into a situation where full Civil Rights under both the Constitution and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights are violated -
In scenario two, we are talking about over 2/3 of the population of the U.S. being affected after only
three years with an intolerance rate of
The ability of that 2/3 of the population to recover from an economic / political castration or simply death (depending on the severity of the
circumstances) in my opinion will be nearly impossible. It could affect families for generations, or permanently.
We will be left with a genetic elite that hold the reigns to some of the most powerful, unethical and dangerous police state mechanics that the U.S.
and the human race has seen in its entire existence.
In addition, the fact that The Patriot Act exists and still has the potential to set the precedent for taking away constitutional rights of U.S.
citizens, and the fact that drones exist and the precedent for them taking out innocent civilians overseas already exists - and the fact that the U.S.
has surveillance systems in place that are already breaking national and international law -
It is absolutely ridiculous, and naive, in my opinion to assume that these powers (which are already being abused overseas) are not going to be abused
even more and on U.S. soil by people who think they are superior.
I don't see a way out of this series of events, to be honest, no alternative presents itself to me. I think it's just the way the cookie
edit on 18amWed, 18 Dec 2013 03:52:04 -0600kbamkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)