It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by snarky412
There is a difference.
Nixon did what he did with the help of my former neighbor hunt.
the nsa has been doing this since before Obama was in office.
and more than likely. Obama wasn't told or was under a need to know basis. plausible deniability.
so yeah the two cases are not the same. situations are different
reply to post by urmenimu
Actually he only has a small percentage of people behind him. The kooky ones who are looking for any reason to get rid of the first black president but did nothing against other presidents.
As usual the keyboard warriors unite and complain on threads...hoping it will help their cause...
reply to post by grey580
This is not true. The original Patriot Act that Bush signed did not enough NSA power and they were limited in scope. The Patriot Act II signed by Obama in his first year in office was supercharged and gave NSA sweeping powers.
This is what happened and Obama is really to blame, even though it was written by Democratic Senators.
That's the real story.
I am sorry, WND, much like THE Blaze are not legitimate sources, and this has been proved time and time again, why are they still allowed here?
52 percent of younger millennials, aged 18-24, told Harvard pollsters that they would support a recalling of the president from the Oval Office. 47 percent of all young voters said they would support such a measure. Fortunately for the president, no provision to recall the President of the United States exists in the Constitution.
It would be nice if it is true? It is true.