It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sky News reported that the Metropolitan olice had said there was "no credible evidence" the SAS was involved. The network said it had obtained a letter written by AC Rowley that said: "Whilst there is a possibility that the alleged comments in relation to the SAS's involvement in the death may have been made, there is no credible or relevant evidence to support a theory that such claims had any basis in fact.
It was understood the allegation was made by the former parents-in-law of a former soldier based on information that the ex-soldier talked about in the past, according to a military source. It is believed the information was passed to the Metropolitan police through the Royal Military police.
I have no idea what happened that tragic night but ...
and lets remember this was NO accident, the verdict was 'UNLAWFUL KILLING'
no credible evidence
The investigations will never, ever reveal anything, ever!
... of course not.. you murdered a royal because she was having the baby to an Arab billionaire.
A royal the people LOVED.
Author Alan Power has revealed in his book 'The Princess Diana Conspiracy', that the radiologist Dr Elizabeth Dion and a nurse saw a "clearly visible" 6-10-week old fetus in her womb, when she was taken to the Paris hospital after her fatal accident, the Daily Star reported.
Whether she was pregnant or not, she had the possibility of becoming pregnant and producing a half muslim heir to the Royal throne, half brother to the future king William! Especially given her history and preference for Muslim men.
I wouldn't say any 'investigation' contained facts..