It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11: "Incontrovertible evidence" that the Saudi Government helped the hijackers

page: 7
75
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 11:58 AM
link   
Here's a big bump for this post:

$130,000 from Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar’s checking account to the (9-11) hijackers


In its report on the still-censored “28 pages” implicating the Saudi government in 9/11, “60 Minutes”
last weekend said the Saudi role in the attacks has been “soft-pedaled” to protect America’s delicate
alliance with the oil-rich kingdom.

snip

" ...$130,000 from then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar’s family checking account to yet another
of the hijackers’ Saudi handlers ..."

snip

“The Saudi ambassador funded two of the 9/11 hijackers through a third party,” Guandolo said. “He
should be treated as a terrorist suspect, as should other members of the Saudi elite class who the US
government knows are currently funding the global jihad.”

snip

After he met on Sept. 13, 2001, with President Bush in the White House, where the two old family friends
shared cigars on the Truman Balcony, the FBI evacuated dozens of Saudi officials from multiple cities,
including at least one Osama bin Laden family member on the terror watch list. Instead of interrogating
the Saudis, FBI agents acted as security escorts for them, even though it was known at the time that 15
of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens.




posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Blackmarketeer

i dont know...somehow...I dont see it happening. Evidence be damned. Too much money is in the game to spoil it over something stupid like justice and truth.

Can they really publicize it if the rumours of its content are true ? I will be positively shocked if that happens.

I assume there is just one copy of these 28 pages ? sure hope something doesnt happen to it...



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 07:47 PM
link   
There were no hijackers



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 04:47 AM
link   
a reply to: _BoneZ_

If you only knew that Saudi supported the "hijackers", and left with only that understanding, the conspiracy falls flat.

Why? Long story short, both aircraft that allegedly hit WTC, according to relevant evidence, did not hit either. That bakes the question, "Where did they go?"

The alternative narrative, which I haven't read of (or seen) is the pilots were involvedand the alleged terrorists were along for the ride (reinforce the current narrative).

There is numerous evidence that alleged cell calls were staged, which lines up with these planes already on the ground at an undisclosed location.

This narrative is the smoking gun, where they landed and the aircraft that was alleged to be the same, which majority of us believe were military grade aircraft, guided into WTC.
edit on 21-7-2017 by SecretSector because: Spelling

edit on 21-7-2017 by SecretSector because: Spelling



new topics

top topics
 
75
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join