posted on Dec, 15 2013 @ 10:28 PM
Well, the word "incontrovertible" is pretty sensationalized to use in a headline. But it IS the Post.
Actually, even the author admits that the rest of what he wrote has already been out there. Only the "leaked memo" is new. And, if it's real ....
Until those 28 pages are declassified, we are left with the already sourced info, which is pretty damning, but nothing like would be proof of Saudi
involvement other than funding.
My question would be at what point did the Saudi govt get involved with an Al Qaeda plot to turn planes into missiles? Did the Saudis gamble on the
United States to go after OBL and do the dirty work of assassinating their unfavorite son, thus keeping their hands clean? (And if OBL was dead, that
would free Saudis from paying Al Qaeda the millions of protection money to keep terrorism off their soil.)
I have contended that the Twin Towers did not necessarily have to fall in order for the 9/11 plot to be effective. IMO too much has been made of their
collapse, as if that were the end game. If one wants to speculate about a Bush-Saudi connection, then a start might be to look back to the 1980s, when
the Saudis donated $32 million to GHW Bush's contra war in Central America.
A lot has been hidden from Americans over the years, and what has been revealed has been ignored. The information in those 28 pages are really only
part of a bigger picture, however. The world stage is a very complicated place, but we still can determine the story.
There are some only too happy to let war be the default. Americans alive today have been at war most of their lives. War is the business Eisenhower
warned us about.