It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chinese Naval Vessel Tries to Force U.S. Warship to Stop in International Waters

page: 7
20
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 02:33 PM
link   

ken10
I don't think they have bases in what, 170 countries, imposing their agendas on others with the use of Drones killing thousands of innocent civilians in the process.

Yet! But, give them time. They are well on their way to usurping that #1 spot.


Oh, and from what I have seen reported China executes those that are corrupt, no matter how big a fish it was.....Honor seems to be a big thing to them.

Honour is to China what religion is to the ME, money to the West, etc.

A tool used to lead the masses in the directions intended.




posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 03:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 





Someone is going to get an itchy trigger finger and we are going to be in a war.


That someone are the same organizations that brought us the Yugoslavian war, Iraqi war and the recently failed Libyan intervention and now they are getting desperate they know they dont have the money to pay to China so how they want to pay them?

By starting a war that would nearly destroy everyone. The reason the Chinese naval vessel was trying to get the US military ship into intentional waters is the result of when America send its B52 bombers on China's defense zone.


In my honest opinion china has every right to have its defense zone. As for the battle over that small worthless island?

That island is far away from Japan so why are the Japanese claiming it?



posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 03:08 PM
link   
Whats the topic of this thread?

Is it about a spat between Chinese and US naval vessels or a pissing contest about WW2?

I thought it was the first one.



posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


The Japanese have claimed it since the 1890s. China had no interest in reclaiming them until the resources were found.



posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 07:28 PM
link   
The feel it's okay to do these things because we didn't do diddly when they forced the EP-3 down or any of the other dozen times it has harassed USNS's in the region.

en.wikipedia.org...(T-AGOS-23)#South_China_Sea_incidents

en.wikipedia.org...

etc



posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 10:56 PM
link   

ken10
I seem to remember a thread where international airspace according to some was not applicable to military planes, I'm sure this was in respect to Iranian planes getting too close to a US drone or something.

Hypocrisy much


Perhaps you would look less a fool if you looked for truth rather than look for things that support your twisted view. The post you linked to happened right after Iran tried to shoot down a US drone in international airspace. They were caught following another drone, and the US pilot let him know he would have a very bad day if they tried to shoot this one down.

Iranian combat planes tried to shoot down a U.S. Predator

theaviationist.com...


edit on 13-12-2013 by ken10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2013 @ 06:19 AM
link   
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
 


And with the US chomping on the bit for an excuse to have a pop at Iran I'm sure that happened ........Not.



posted on Dec, 14 2013 @ 10:21 AM
link   
reply to post by ken10
 


Oh yes because only the US is the bad guy. Other countries never do anything wrong, just like you aren't biased.



posted on Dec, 14 2013 @ 07:26 PM
link   
US should not have been tail gating China's air craft carrier.
the other ship just stop't them doing it.

it said on BBC world service radio,
that the us ship was following China's air craft carrier very closely.
the other China ship just got in the way.



posted on Dec, 14 2013 @ 07:41 PM
link   
reply to post by buddha
 


So it's ok for China to pop up in the middle of a battlegroup, or follow US carriers closely? Or Chinese aircraft to shadow US aircraft and put them in danger of a midair collision?



posted on Dec, 15 2013 @ 03:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 

The Bedford incident, great movie, watch it....



posted on Dec, 15 2013 @ 04:42 AM
link   

H1ght3chHippie
So how do you provide "relieve efforts" with a guided missile ship ?

The US is full of it.



It might have a helicopter, plus empting its food stores, water distillation plant, deck hands to help clear trash, any number of reasons.



posted on Dec, 15 2013 @ 07:08 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by ken10
 


Oh yes because only the US is the bad guy. Other countries never do anything wrong, just like you aren't biased.


Oh I'm sorry Zaph, silly me, those Iranian pilots were wrong to keep an eye on those spy Drones....I mean its not like they would have been flown over Iranian airspace spying now, would it.


OK lets take a reality check here, there has been enough evidence posted on this site over the years to make the claim and back it up that the US is an unparalleled corrupted warmongering Nation with aspirations of world dominance !!!

And you gotta ask, does the US have the equivalent to the JIDF...and are they here ?

Lets get real.



posted on Dec, 15 2013 @ 10:06 AM
link   
reply to post by ken10
 


They can keep an eye on it all they want, shooting at it is completely different. Oh wait, of course Iran wouldn't do that right?



posted on Dec, 15 2013 @ 10:07 AM
link   
reply to post by pikestaff
 


Two helicopters, a small Marine detachment, water desalination plant, etc.



posted on Dec, 16 2013 @ 07:41 AM
link   

Mindmonopoly
reply to post by NavyDoc
 


So if the us is such a great supplier of relief efforts over the world and help everyone please tell me why you aint doing shiet in places like Palestine, Zimbabwe est.
because there is nothing to gain nothing to plunder, no oil, no diamonds, no nothing just people who really suffer and would benefit most from said relief efforts. Stop playing the mind games we aint all idiots you know. Some of us do see pass bull sht hey.


One can't be everywhere all at once. What materiel gain did we get from the Philippines? If all we want is to rape the natural resources while pretending to help, why are we not doing more in sub-Saharan Africa?



posted on Dec, 16 2013 @ 07:44 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by Bisman
 


When the fighters would intercept Russian aircraft they were occasionally known to swap centerfolds.


LOL. When tracking Soviet Submarines, if they surfaced, we often dropped them "care packages" containing porn and snacks.



posted on Dec, 17 2013 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


Thats the year when The Japanese Empire was still spreading its wings.



posted on Dec, 17 2013 @ 08:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


And prior to 1970, when the islands were returned to Japanese control by the US (they were administered by the US post WWII), China had no interest in reclaiming them. In 1968, the resources report compiled about the resources under the islands was released, and suddenly China wants the islands back. Go figure.



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join