The title is what it is, and it is accurate to the story. I wish it were sensationalized or somehow making mountains out of molehills, but it's not
and I'm not. First, a refresher. This story has been seen here before, at an earlier stage in the process. It outraged me then, too, as it did many
Family Violently Targeted After Standing Against Teacher Who Molested Their 8th Grade
The basic story of what led to this point is simple and this man is a convicted child rapist, so I'm not even going to play at mincing words about
what level of pond scum the conviction places him among. The lowest, of the lowest...of the worst, in my view.
Even a 'run of the mill' child molester (If there IS such a thing) gets a half a rung higher than this human predator. Why? "Chester The Molester"
isn't raping a captive child for THREE YEARS as a figure of absolute authority over them, in their school. This one did.......but that isn't the
worst part now.
Now someone figures he should be paid.
What he did:
Where the money came into this:
Neal Erickson, a former math teacher at Rose City Middle School, was convicted this summer of raping a young student over three years, from
2006 to 2009, and sentenced to 15-30 years in prison.
On March 26, 2013 WB-RC officials offered a $10,000 buyout for any qualifying teacher who left the school district that year, an incentive
superintendent Dan Cwayna said the district had used in the past to encourage needed staff reductions.
While its not clear when Erickson’s employment was terminated, the union’s action suggests he was still on the payroll when the buyout was offered
and accepted it.
The school district declined to pay him the money, prompting the union’s action.
I kid you not..and oh how I wish I could. It's no secret I don't much care for Unions of any sort. However, ANY Union actively taking on the support
of a child rapist has MAJOR problems and I'd look to every individual member of that Union to ask.......so....How do you feel about your dues going
to help this man?
I'd also note, the REASON he would have "separated" that year had squat to do with any buyout. That would have been a snarky little bonus to this
guy. He lost his job for raping a little grade school child for years, over and over and over again. THAT is what got his tail canned like a sardine.
...and that is what isn't supposed to matter.
Last, but ABSOLUTELY never least, the comment from the family and I think it about sums up the whole matter here.
The Family Opinion:
Janczewski said he’s now committed to doing anything he can to prevent Erickson from receiving the special severance.
“We as a family in no way is going to let this happen. I mean, a child molester paid to molest a student?” Janczewski said. “He doesn’t
It should be noted on this story, especially in light of the heat the District got in an earlier thread, the School District did NOT do this. In fact,
the Superintendent there is who personally red lined this payment and stopped it from being made. The Union and the Union alone, by how this reads, is
who is pushing for the rights of a child rapist.
As the family said...A rapist shouldn't be paid for having been a rapist. A teacher deserved the severance. A rapist deserves the prison cell this
one has gotten..and I do hope every night is like a year for him in there. Every one of them.