It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
pandersway
I've been saying it all along. The Rockefellers, Rothchilds and Morgans----THESE families need to be shut down PERMANENTLY!
S. 1353
To provide for an ongoing, voluntary public-private partnership to improve cybersecurity, ...and for other purposes.
...any information shared to increase cyber security will not (can not) be used by Federal, State, Local or Tribal departments or agencies to regulate the activity of any entity
dreamingawake
Jay Rockefeller (D WVA) has attached a cyber-security amendment (attached below) to the NDAA 2014 bill in Congress to mandate that precautions be taken to protect America’s cyber infrastructure and private entities.,,
Rockefeller attaches cybersecurity bill to National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2014
(viii) include such other similar and consistent elements as the Director considers necessary;
The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, in coordination with the head of any relevant Federal agency, shall build upon programs and plans in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act to develop a Federal cybersecurity research and development plan to meet objectives in cybersecurity, such as—
...
(E) how to build new protocols to enable the Internet to have robust security as one of the key capabilities of the Internet;
(F) how to determine the origin of a message transmitted over the Internet; ...
(H) how to address the growing problem of insider threats; ...
(K) any additional objectives the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, in coordination with the head of any relevant Federal agency and with input from stakeholders, including industry and academia, determines appropriate.
BuzzCory
reply to post by dreamingawake
I just finished reading the bill, & I have to add my opinion to those already expressed, that there doesn't seem to be any framework outlined which will allow for the furtherance of a police state restricting freedom of speech.
I'm not saying that a police state wouldn't be the preferred condition for those in charge, but at least in this instance, there doesn't seem to be anything pointing in that direction other than the unfounded leap in logic made by the author of the blog linked to in the OP.
I read it with skepticism turned 'way up, & what I saw is, IMO, the end product of an awareness of just how dependent/vulnerable we've become due to our reliance of all things networked & potentially accessible by "outsiders". I might even go so far as to say that, in this instance, it's almost a relief to see that vulnerability being taken so seriously... a real issue meriting concern this time, rather than a manufactured one with the aim of furthering a hidden agenda.
And trust me, I never thought I'd see the day when I'd say anything like this about something put forth by a member of the Rockefeller family!
Cabin
reply to post by dreamingawake
This has been circuling around for couple of weeks already. If I remember it was also posted in RT, as well as different investing portals.
I will take a look at the bill myself, currently do not have time for it, although based on what is written in the hill:
The measure is far more modest than legislation that Rockefeller and other Senate Democrats backed last year. That bill would have pressured critical infrastructure companies, such as banks and power plants, to meet minimum cybersecurity regulations.
After opposition from Republicans killed last year's bill, President Obama issued an executive order instructing the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to craft voluntary cybersecurity best-practices for critical infrastructure companies.
Rockefeller's amendment would codify the executive order into law. It would also boost cybersecurity education, research and development for cyber threats.
thehill.com...
Article describing the EO:www.federalnewsradio.com...
Executive Order 13636 from February: www.gpo.gov...
Well I personally do not see anything abnormal in these bills. Cybersecurity is becoming more and more a risk, considering how much damage can be done via cyberattacks. A small loophole in the security of some corporations can get the data from millions to the hands of some individuas. These bills just seem to be requiring the largest corporations in certain fields more critical to set higher standards for their cyber-security. But well, I might be wrong as well, my legal reading skills are not the best.
Philippines
pandersway
I've been saying it all along. The Rockefellers, Rothchilds and Morgans----THESE families need to be shut down PERMANENTLY!
Agreed completely, but at this point in time, old corporate and political family dynasties have amassed and consolidated so much power not much can be done.
They are and have been a problem around the world for a long time: two separate classes (in their own mind) -- them and everyone else -- with two separate laws for the classes, and the law does not apply to them like the rest of us.
SubTruth
reply to post by Philippines
What people should do is study Nazi Germany. Hitler did not gain power overnight it took years. They used fear,poverty,the progressive mindset to rise to the top.
To be honest this will have to play out just like it did back then. Nothing can be done to stop it. And TPTB have figured this out. Change will only come when the food and entertainment run out. Until then kiss your liberty goodbye.edit on 12-12-2013 by SubTruth because: (no reason given)