It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And think about it, spiders hang out on our buildings spinning their webs so that they can catch their prey
a strange creature has been captured by a moviemaker that was at home. the boy
The real question to this video is: Why would someone be filming a random building at night? Expecting to see what exactly? I could record the sky from my window every night for years straight and never get a real UFO on camera. This is why i think it's a hoax, but it's really good and well done - so good that it looks real to me.
PSA: Watch the ORIGINAL video (the one with sound, posted several times by others in this thread), NOT the one that has been sabotaged to make the CGI literally blend in to the environment, creating false realism by adding compression artifacts and GREATLY reducing the framerate
(the one posted in the OP).
Now to the original video:
It's been done well, but there are still key points at which my FAKE alarm goes off pertaining to the movements of the creature, when the logic center in my brain screams, "I've seen enough physical interactions through these eyes to know when something does not follow the rules that I have concluded to be an accurate representation of reality".
It just doesn't fit well enough with its surroundings or the laws of physics to go unnoticed, which is why the lowered-framerate video was created: to remove words (the evidence of the truth) from the book and force you to read between the lines (creating a new, false "truth").
It's got nothing to do with the creature itself. I had no problem whatsoever accepting that the video I was about to watch could be legitimate, and was actually quite excited by the thread title. Upon my first viewing however that excitement was quickly replaced by the feeling I get when inadvertently being linked to an "ADGUK" or "ThirdPhaseOfMoon" video; complete disappointment in myself for having believed for even a moment that someone on the internet was being honest about a paranormal event.
reply to post by D0MiNAT0R 1OOO
I would thank you to include the original video footage in your thread post. Otherwise I should like to make a complaint about your blatant omission of evidence in the OP.