It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
KellyPrettyBear
And it's at this juncture that we won't
agree necessarily.
KellyPrettyBear
reply to post by Itisnowagain
We have brains for a reason; their whole purpose
is not to just generate a false self to trap us into
suffering.
It's my inclination to open the cage.
KellyPrettyBear
No, I'm not interested in your 'materials'.
theopendoorway.org...
Since Reality is always and eternally perfect and complete, in its constant final condition, and since "our" relationship to it, to consciousness/intelligence/energy, is already and eternally in a state of perfect fruition, our only "spiritual" task is to NOTICE this actual state of affairs; AND IT HAPPENS THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE.
KellyPrettyBear
reply to post by Itisnowagain
So you DO believe that the 2 pounds of brain in our head serves
no purpose but to delude us and trap us.
Itisnowagain
The brain speaks words and this gives the impression that there is someone in a cage.
theopendoorway.org...
BUT... for "spirituality", inquiry into Reality, into our true condition, words/ideas are worse than useless. They are potentially our biggest impediment.
This is because we may tend to assume that the objects/actions which words refer to, ACTUALLY EXIST IN THE WAY THE WORDS THAT REFER TO THEM SEEM TO DEFINE THEM. That is, we may tend to view our experience as being actually made up of the objects and actions that the words we are using to describe it imply.
This is a fundamental mistake, due to the fact that ALL experience is in actuality an infinite, constantly changing, non-repeating, indefinable (in any final way), unpatterned field of miraculously appearing Radiantly Present "energies" existing nowhere else than IN experience, perceived by unknowable, miraculously appearing "consciousness". But our use of words implies that objects and actions may actually exist in the way we refer to them, as knowable, definable objectively existing "beings", "things" and "situations".
This is actually NOT the case.