posted on Dec, 14 2013 @ 02:18 AM
reply to post by kingears
Anyone with an intent and disposition of duty so as to alter a train of thought into a predetermined conclusion is best served by falsely alerting
others to the presence of information tacticians. Then by just talking about moves and counter moves of disinformation, their presence is better
undetected and their validity of argument becomes more convincing.
So by staging a witch hunt, they can wild out as witches.
They can affect the mindset of listeners and what the initial argument to any desired group is just by ousting someone as a tactician. You can become
vindicated by a lie. You can influence the way people see Lies and convince them that the lies are to be honored as truth...because you say you are
"Someone interested only in the common good of all or the revelation of truth".
Any intent can be made out to be any intent for any purpose. Who defines it and designates a purpose to it is just who says what that intent is
louder. Even if its not their own to know or speak about.
For example: I can say you are a bully so much or so well so as to have people gang up on you. In essence becoming a more effective bully to you by
using others who are supposedly against bullying.
Skeptics can be made to doubt reality so much as to hide real lies in all the uncertainty, thus using their own skepticism to place a veil over their
eyes. Example: If someone is trying to convince a group of their immanent danger because they havent socially lynched someone or group for what ever
reason, a mob mentality can then be brewed until you have a full blown witch hunt on your hands for "the bad guy /liar" you heroically singled out.
Hard core believers can be made to see reality where there is none but their own perspective which they may not control. They can be lied to by using
false skepticism. Skepticism as a social cooking technique for increasing the ardent ferver to what ever cause. Example : If I say that Satan "MAY" be
in rock and roll enough....I may then be able to convince others that the best response to something I say is "evil" /wrong is to encourage people to
take a counter position to that which I alone decided that we all consider it "evil". I can even ask you to burn some Rock and Roll records for
example. Thus other things considered "evil" can be hidden by just being ANTI Rock and Roll.....
Both are tactics for swaying thought. There is no safe mindset that can not be used to manipulate a person.
Social programming can happen upon Sheeple and Skeptics alike. Its just a matter of adjusting your own argument to be in proximity to what was already
established as valid or not. Even things which you validated or placed doubt upon yourself. After that it is considered absolute....truth or not you
can use it to sway thought.
edit on 12 14 2013 by tadaman because: (no reason given)