Interesting that someone should mention the phone traffic from Portugal that night as there seems to be a suggestion that the child's disappearance
was an unfortunate coincidence that overlapped into other areas and that, the drawing of threads together was never going to be allowed.
In short and this is so convoluted it's not easy to totally grasp even now. The Mccanns were staying in roughly the same area that a known suspected
major player in paedophile activities in Britain had fled to and contemporary to the Mccanns trip to Portugal a friend of said suspected paedophile,
had chosen to visit as well. The resident suspected paedophile had left Britain in the wake some investigations that had taken place and been covered
up. They had moved to Portugal after they them self or someone had suggested it would be "Better for their health" were they to do so. It is suspected
that, this person was being observed not only by Portuguese police rather also the British security forces were keeping their eye on them. It is said
that the suspected paedophile was British security "asset" rather than, under actual investigation. It is also believed that, said suspected
paedophile was also a subject of interest for the Murdoch mob and that they were attempting to hack his phone in order to try and glean information
about certain powerful people believed to have been involved in other illegal activities involving various sexual proclivities.
It would seem that, the suspected Paedophile was making regular calls to someone connected to the British embassy in Portugal and therefore it became
of interest to Murdoch and co as to this person's interests. Were they merely a friend, innocent of all knowledge of the suspected paedophiles'
activities or were they, in effect, their "control"? Murdoch's cronies then bugged the phone line to the British embassy and it was here they were
alerted about the Mccann's story and it is suggested they also were party to a conversation about the British embassy official's "unofficial view" of
what happened that night at the Mccann's apartment. On hearing this, Murdoch's mob immediately decided to hack the Mccann's phones and record every
single call they made on those phones for some months.
Only they now had one huge problem, as it happened abroad and as the Mccann's friends were saying nothing, to print any of what they thought they
knew, would serve to show quite conclusively they must have been hacking the Mccann's phones.
Now, this is where it really starts to become very very murky indeed. Some believe that, at this point in the proceedings that, British security
stepped in and in order to protect their suspected paedophile "asset" said that, they wanted no mention of paedophiles and Maddie made in the press.
Hence. the whole palaver about child kidnap gangs and still being alive and brought up as someone else's child etc. In other words, mentioning
paedophilia would mean their "asset" would be fingered and probably chased by the press with almost immediate effect.
What nobody knows is, what exactly the contents of the original hacked phone calls from the British embassy about the Mccann's case was. Furthermore,
it didn't help one iota when the story about Gerry and his friend's seemingly very inappropriate language with regards to young children, was made
At this point it is worth remembering something that had appeared on-line contemporary to Maddie's vanishing act. it was the same time frame that
stories began to circulate that, Britain's involvement in the second Gulf War was , in part, prompted by the CIA telling Blair straight to his face
that. "Should Britain not become involved, it would be very unfortunate if stories about the various sexual proclivities of politicians of all parties
and some other establishment figures should find their way into the press".
So, we have child disappear in seemingly mysterious circumstances nearby to where one of Britain's security assets, who was suspected of being a
"predatory paedophile" was living. By the time it became apparent that, the Mccann's testimony threw up way more questions than they answered and
that the finger of accusation was most definitely turning towards them it was too late. In their haste to protect their security asset from exposure
they had, in effect let the Mccann's off the hook and they were unable to back track without having to answer some very embarrassing questions about
why they were seemingly, so clueless , in the immediate aftermath of Maddie's disappearance.
it has also been mooted in some of the more "out there" parts of the blogosphere that, the Mcann's holiday to Portugal was not the innocent family
holiday it has been made out to be and that, off camera, at least one forensic psychologist has privately ventured the opinion that. On the evidence
that has found its' way into the public realm in the ensuing months and years that, at least one person in the Mccann's party was/is prone to
indulging in "inappropriate sexual activities".
To try and sum up then... Maddie, as was the initial investigation, was the victim of a totally coincidental set of circumstances that contrived to
allow the Mccann's "off the hook" as it were and that. Once the ball had started rolling there was no real going back without exposing the fact that,
the initial investigation into a child's disappearance had been hamstrung and wrecked, for purely politically expedient reasons. By the time they
realised that... "Oh crap, she probably wasn't kidnapped for nefarious purposes rather, the victim of some domestic "accident"....and that, their
security asset was never likely to be exposed by a proper investigation into Maddie's disappearance it was too late. The Mccann's had wormed their way
into the media's affections on their own terms and were, to all intents and purposes, unassailable, without severe political repercussions and fall
Meanwhile, Murdoch used his knowledge of hacked calls from all the parties concerned to help ensure that, the Levenson enquiry and any subsequent
trials for criminal offences, would not fall at his door personally rather, land on his subordinates' heads.
My apologies for the totally labyrinthine nature of this post however, the "security asset" and their presence in the area at the time of Maddie's
disappearance has been posted on-line by several well known bloggers whose primary interest is in spheres not really allied to that of the Mccann
investigation. Furthermore, records do show that that person was in Portugal at the time and since then that, around the time of Maddie's
disappearance another person visited them whose own reputation was , decidedly murky, shall we say?
By no means am I saying this is a definitive answer however, it does account for a hell of a lot of what seemed to go "wrong" on so many levels and
let's be honest, it's a darn sight more credible than some of the utter piffle the Mccanns have totted out down the years.
edit on 17-4-2014
by FireMoon because: grammar