It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Proof is something that CANNOT be disproved by a valid experiment. Source of definition of PROOF
Full Definition of PROOF
a : the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact
b : the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning
Oh how I wish this were true!
You're gonna have troubles with "valid experiment"; it's not as well defined as yall think.
Here is some evidence that cannot be "disproven". Mathematically, probabilistically, this bit of evidence demonstrates the reality of at least one "off world visitor".
Is this evidence acceptable? Prolly not, even after your wee search for the definition of proof.
And, "Why" is this not acceptable?
but as we shall see in other installments, this probability changes.
What would be the worldwide reaction?
Also, take the top 10 power countries in the world who have good technology -- wouldn't at least 1 of them come forward with undisputed proof?
Let's say, tomorrow, China or Russia announced their knowledge and evidence of intelligent extraterrestrials.
I want to know what may be holding back major countries from revealing major confirmation.
I don't want this thread to go into the debate of whether or not Grays exist.
You can have alien life...OR...you can have God. But you can't have both.
I can't think of any situation in which religion and first contact could occur together and not result in man's destruction.
I live in Europe and i would dispute somebody saying it's commonly accepted that 9/11 was an inside job.
the comspiracy theories are all well known, but not accpeted as reality.edit on 18-12-2013 by WilsonWilson because: (no reason given)edit on 18-12-2013 by WilsonWilson because: .