It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I feel the whole concept of a pay to view "museum" that is based on a significant tragedy is all wrong. It debases the memory of those that I'm sure would rather have not died only to become part of a sideshow. They're charging a fee for christ sake. That's just all wrong as is putting this stuff on exhibit.
0bserver1
reply to post by Bilk22
I don't admire it for its beauty but for the message and how it , and where it came from and what it finally formed when it crashed ground zero..
I think you can see by the faces and the twisted state it was when they found it , the pain of the catastrophe ..
And maybe for some it has the right position to punish the guilty ?
0bserver1
reply to post by sulaw
I see two , woman and behind I see a man's face
Yes. That's been part of the uproar. The other part is, many of the relatives of those that died, don't want this museum either. It's just really poor taste to do this.
0bserver1
reply to post by Bilk22
I didn't know that you had to pay to see it.. if that's true then that's really a sad though it should be in public to view but not fot sale..
I believe many of the families do not want the museum. Period. Some are ok with it but not the fee. You can do a google search and find quite a few articles on it. From what I understand, some of the "unidentified remains" may also be included in the museum. That too is in the articles. This is just wrong all the way around. Some type of memorial is appropriate. Putting debris and other stuff on exhibit for a fee, is morbid and does not honor anyone.
0bserver1
reply to post by Bilk22
That makes things clearer. . I do agree with that. So do they want the metal wreckage to be free and public available ,or do they want the whole museum free to the public or non at all?
Edit: Even exhibiting the remains of the structure is wrong. It's juts a bad reminder of the event. Honor the fallen and not the event.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
reply to post by Bilk22
Edit: Even exhibiting the remains of the structure is wrong. It's juts a bad reminder of the event. Honor the fallen and not the event.
But that's your personal view , not all people will share that view. Some people maybe the ones who lost someone there would love to have something tangible to go too..