It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And then somehow they would avoid discussing any of the issues by using a mixture of p.c. (political correctness), and shutting down opposing opinions by asking for sources and then invalidating sources after they are given - or basically a lot of nonsense that is all about avoiding discussing the core issues given, and inherently incoherent in itself.
Harris gets pummeled here in front of the students when the questions begin after their presentations... Harris was a kin to watching a kid argue with their parents about taking out the trash.
windword
reply to post by SisyphusRide
Harris gets pummeled here in front of the students when the questions begin after their presentations... Harris was a kin to watching a kid argue with their parents about taking out the trash.
Only someone who is already predispositioned to believe the same as William Lane Craig would see him as winning this debate.
Craig: Mr Harris claims it's psychopathic to believe in these things,
^ Koenig e.a.: "There is no widely agreed on definition of spirituality today".[1] Cobb e.a.: "The spiritual dimension is deeply subjective and there is no authoritative definition of spirituality".[2]
Cobb, Mark R.; Puchalski, Christina M.; Rumbold, Bruce (2012), Oxford Textbook of Spirituality in Healthcare
Koenig, Harold; King, Dana; Carson, Verna B. (2012), Handbook of Religion and Health, Oxford UP
The use of the term "spirituality" has changed throughout the ages.[4] In modern times, spirituality is often separated from Abrahamic religions,[5] and connotes a blend of humanistic psychology with mystical and esoteric traditions and eastern religions aimed at personal well-being and personal development.[6] The notion of "spiritual experience" plays an important role in modern spirituality, but has a relatively recent origin.[7]
wildtimes
reply to post by SisyphusRide
Craig: Mr Harris claims it's psychopathic to believe in these things,
And he didn't. When Craig said that, I said out loud, "No. He did not."
Shall I run through the vid and find what Harris DID say? That 'rebuttal' in particular was one that popped out at me (and may have been the point where I decided he'd lost the debate, because he misconstrued what Harris said).
yes he did... would you like me to post the time index?
Harris also claims that "everyone" needs signs from the sky... this is untrue.
AfterInfinity
reply to post by SisyphusRide
I gave you a Wikipedia article. "The term spirituality lacks a definitive definition"
What more do you need? The footnotes?
^ Koenig e.a.: "There is no widely agreed on definition of spirituality today".[1] Cobb e.a.: "The spiritual dimension is deeply subjective and there is no authoritative definition of spirituality".[2]
Cobb, Mark R.; Puchalski, Christina M.; Rumbold, Bruce (2012), Oxford Textbook of Spirituality in Healthcare
Koenig, Harold; King, Dana; Carson, Verna B. (2012), Handbook of Religion and Health, Oxford UP
You want more?
The use of the term "spirituality" has changed throughout the ages.[4] In modern times, spirituality is often separated from Abrahamic religions,[5] and connotes a blend of humanistic psychology with mystical and esoteric traditions and eastern religions aimed at personal well-being and personal development.[6] The notion of "spiritual experience" plays an important role in modern spirituality, but has a relatively recent origin.[7]
So tell me, do you see a scientific basis in this summary of spirituality? You wanted sources, I give you sources. Now you're going to tell me these sources aren't good enough, right?edit on 5-12-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
Ok, well here we’re being offered—I’m glad he raised the issue of psychopathy—we are being offered a psychopathic and psychotic moral attitude. It’s psychotic because this is completely delusional. There’s no reason to believe that we live in a universe ruled by an invisible monster Yahweh. But it is, it is psychopathic because this is a total detachment from the, from the well-being of human beings. It, this so easily rationalizes the slaughter of children. Ok, just think about the Muslims at this moment who are blowing themselves up, convinced that they are agents of God’s will. There is absolutely nothing that Dr. Craig can s—can say against their behavior, in moral terms, apart from his own faith-based claim that they’re praying to the wrong God. If they had the right God, what they were doing would be good, on Divine Command theory.
Now, I’m obviously not saying that all that Dr. Craig, or all religious people, are psychopaths and psychotics, but this to me is the true horror of religion. It allows perfectly decent and sane people to believe by the billions, what only lunatics could believe on their own. If you wake up tomorrow morning thinking that saying a few Latin words over your pancakes is gonna turn them into the body of Elvis Presley, ok, you have lost your mind. But if you think more or less the same thing about a cracker and the body of Jesus, you’re just a Catholic.
Read more: www.reasonablefaith.org...
That's quite interesting that the Wiki editor would not say that spiritualism is as old as mankind.
Let's see, Gobekli Tepe, the oldest religious structure in the world, was in fact a temple of Tengri to the ancient Turkic people, and Tengri has always been called "Sky Father".
Other ancient sources include The Oracle at Delphi. And the ancient Romans and Greeks believed in reading entrails of dead animals.
What the editor is trying to suggest is that the term "Spiritualism" is recent because of Aleister Crowley and Madame Blavatsky,