It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
as mentioned by devilwasp
firstly you break UN law by invadeing iraq wich you justify by using your constitution.
Resolution 678, passed on Nov. 29, 1990, authorized member states to "use all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area." (Resolution 660, passed on Aug. 2, 1990, demanded that Iraq withdraw from Kuwait.)
Some Bush administration officials have argued that because Iraq has not complied with the cease-fire terms of Resolution 687 (a subsequent relevant resolution), which required it to disarm and cooperate with weapons inspectors, among other things, member states still have sufficient legal authority to use force ("all necessary means") against Iraq.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Try that it is still debatable and IF it was an "illegial invasion," what nation-states are lining up to press the issue?
Jusitification can be found in multitudes of places, but then again, "justification" is a relative term, isn't it?