It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wrabbit2000
"Apollo Defenders"? Is that what we're called these days? lol.....
A label for everything and to everything must go at least one label. Sheesh...
SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by wildespace
Are you referring specifically to cislunar and orbital pictures? Because there are photos astronauts took of each other on the surface, including ones taken by Pete Conrad.
Inconclusive. Neil & Buzz took snaps on the lunar surface as did Cernan & Schmidt. I am looking for faces, not space suits.
Komodo
how can this be since the soviet union put a flag on the space station and it was destroyed with less than a year and ...
our flag is still standing after 50 years & enduring cosmic radiation and being bombarded my micrometers ??
SayonaraJupiter
Pete Conrad was a goofball. If he was really in cis-lunar space he would have taken photos of the trip. The fact that he DID NOT TAKE PHOTOS is a red flag that you can't explain, because Apollo 11 took candid images while Apollo 12 did not.
SayonaraJupiter
Pete Conrad was a goofball. If he was really in cis-lunar space he would have taken photos of the trip. The fact that he DID NOT TAKE PHOTOS is a red flag that you can't explain, because Apollo 11 took candid images while Apollo 12 did not.
wildespace
So, now you want to see faces? Nice cop-out.
SayonaraJupiter
and they have so many cameras with them on a perilous journey to the "moon"
SayonaraJupiter
I will gladly destroy you in any formal debate on that subject. Please understand something. You don't know how many Hasselblads cameras went to/or came back from the moon. Therefore, you would be destroyed in a formal debate.
I
SayonaraJupiter
I will simply ask you "how many hasselblad cameras went to the moon and how many hasselblad cameras were brought back" and you will be totally destroyed because you don't know the correct answer.
Do you get the picture now?
Soylent Green Is People
cprnicus
Looking at the moons surface there is abundant evidence of crater erosion with time. It makes sense that most of this is from gravitational effects but also those effects stated from micro meteors and particles travelling at tens of thousands of mph? Makes me wonder why the flag is still there also. Either its made from the same stuff as Superman's cape or it's not there at all. Another DOH! for NASA?
The meteorite craters you see on the moon have accumulated over 4 billion years time. Some of those craters you see are billions of years old. The flags have only been there less than 45 years. I'm sure a few micrometeors may have struck the flags, but probably not too many.
The bigger threat to the nylon of the flag is ultraviolet light from the sun. The flag is perhaps worn, faded, and maybe tattered, but it could very well still be there on the pole. The video simply shows a shadow, and a worn faded (and even slightly tattered) flag would still cast a shadow. No one is claiming that the flag is still in pristine condition.
SayonaraJupiter
Wrabbit2000
"Apollo Defenders"? Is that what we're called these days? lol.....
A label for everything and to everything must go at least one label. Sheesh...
It is an adequate title for what they do. They defend, therefore they are defenders.
It is not an insult to call someone an Apollo Defender, I respect them. The Apollo Defenders usually do a good job of defending and I respect those who make an good effort. Most of the time they do not respect those who ask legit questions, such as, how many Hasselblads were sent/returned from the "moon". I don't think you have an answer for that either.
It's not an insult, it's a compliment!
buster2010
Soylent Green Is People
cprnicus
Looking at the moons surface there is abundant evidence of crater erosion with time. It makes sense that most of this is from gravitational effects but also those effects stated from micro meteors and particles travelling at tens of thousands of mph? Makes me wonder why the flag is still there also. Either its made from the same stuff as Superman's cape or it's not there at all. Another DOH! for NASA?
The meteorite craters you see on the moon have accumulated over 4 billion years time. Some of those craters you see are billions of years old. The flags have only been there less than 45 years. I'm sure a few micrometeors may have struck the flags, but probably not too many.
The bigger threat to the nylon of the flag is ultraviolet light from the sun. The flag is perhaps worn, faded, and maybe tattered, but it could very well still be there on the pole. The video simply shows a shadow, and a worn faded (and even slightly tattered) flag would still cast a shadow. No one is claiming that the flag is still in pristine condition.
The flag on the moon is not made of nylon it is made of tinfoil. The nylon flag we took to the moon we brought back.
buster2010
Soylent Green Is People
cprnicus
Looking at the moons surface there is abundant evidence of crater erosion with time. It makes sense that most of this is from gravitational effects but also those effects stated from micro meteors and particles travelling at tens of thousands of mph? Makes me wonder why the flag is still there also. Either its made from the same stuff as Superman's cape or it's not there at all. Another DOH! for NASA?
The meteorite craters you see on the moon have accumulated over 4 billion years time. Some of those craters you see are billions of years old. The flags have only been there less than 45 years. I'm sure a few micrometeors may have struck the flags, but probably not too many.
The bigger threat to the nylon of the flag is ultraviolet light from the sun. The flag is perhaps worn, faded, and maybe tattered, but it could very well still be there on the pole. The video simply shows a shadow, and a worn faded (and even slightly tattered) flag would still cast a shadow. No one is claiming that the flag is still in pristine condition.
The flag on the moon is not made of nylon it is made of tinfoil. The nylon flag we took to the moon we brought back.
wmd_2008
webstra
wmd_2008
webstra
DJW001
cascade
Back in the 1970's a friend of mine said we didn't really go to the moon. I thought he was a bit off by thinking that we didn't go there. Now years later looking at it, I am not sure.
I remember those years. No hand held LCD calculators, cell phones, etc etc. Too much animation was used as well.
Myth Busters did a show about it and they proved ( to satisfy the government ? ) that we indeed did land on the moon.
I'm going to sit this one out on the fence. I really don't know.
I know! It's like those idiots who think that Christopher Columbus could cross the Atlantic without GPS or diesel engines! Morons.
It's looks like Apollogists getting desparate given examples like these.
YOU have not contributed one thing to this thread but asinine (look it up) comments not one piece of information or a useful link !!!!
Like GaryN mentions The aulis.com site is a good one.
'An extensive study of Apollo imagery by photo analyst Jack White'
It's a site where you can learn a lot wmd_2008. Not only people who are new with the apollo fakery, also apollogists maybe finaly can come to grips with the apollo scam.
YOU are the one that needs to LEARN two words answers that BS
TYRES & CONTRAST
Apollo Lander Tyre
If you cant understand why just post many on here can explain it to YOU!!!!
webstra
wmd_2008
webstra
wmd_2008
webstra
DJW001
cascade
Back in the 1970's a friend of mine said we didn't really go to the moon. I thought he was a bit off by thinking that we didn't go there. Now years later looking at it, I am not sure.
I remember those years. No hand held LCD calculators, cell phones, etc etc. Too much animation was used as well.
Myth Busters did a show about it and they proved ( to satisfy the government ? ) that we indeed did land on the moon.
I'm going to sit this one out on the fence. I really don't know.
I know! It's like those idiots who think that Christopher Columbus could cross the Atlantic without GPS or diesel engines! Morons.
It's looks like Apollogists getting desparate given examples like these.
YOU have not contributed one thing to this thread but asinine (look it up) comments not one piece of information or a useful link !!!!
Like GaryN mentions The aulis.com site is a good one.
'An extensive study of Apollo imagery by photo analyst Jack White'
It's a site where you can learn a lot wmd_2008. Not only people who are new with the apollo fakery, also apollogists maybe finaly can come to grips with the apollo scam.
YOU are the one that needs to LEARN two words answers that BS
TYRES & CONTRAST
Apollo Lander Tyre
If you cant understand why just post many on here can explain it to YOU!!!!
Don't you think it's a lot wiser to put your energy in how to get rid of this hoax of giant proportion then trying to be the debunking-king ?
We just weren't there....get over it !edit on 20-2-2014 by webstra because: (no reason given)
buster2010
There are twelve Hasselblads cameras currently sitting on the Moon.
SayonaraJupiter
buster2010
There are twelve Hasselblads cameras currently sitting on the Moon.
Please go read this thread Hasselblads On The Moon which will probably make you change your mind about it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
wildespace
...At least one camera per mission was to be used in the Command Module only. Edgar Mitchell could have brought one of those CM cameras back, and left his EVA camera on the Moon.