posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:46 PM
The OP just wrote up a rather psychotic post, and sounded like he needs a little work in his life on his understanding of earth 101 and what its
He should start thinking about the safety of children and all people, their sovereign rights and revamp his belief systems so he can leave darth
vaders crew and start
And I hope he hasn't harmed a child....
on 2-12-2013 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
If the topic that we were discussing was the safety of children, then yes I could see the safety of the children being a relevant topic of
discussion. But since it's not always the topic of discussion, why is it always used as a rationale for a persons position to be delegitimized?
Even now you suggested that I was the author of a "psychotic post", that I should "leave darth vaders crew." Without question your most impressive
contribution was when you said, "I hope he hasn't harmed a child." How that even crossed your mind is beyond me.
You have basically taken the bait, hook, line and sinker. When someone even suggests that less emotional techniques be employed for countering a
persons viewpoint, you call them a child harming psycho. Now, are you capable of articulating your reasoning without calling me a war criminal?
Somehow I doubt it.
edit on 2-12-2013 by hammanderr because: punctuation
edit on 2-12-2013 by hammanderr because: quoting is
edit on 2-12-2013 by hammanderr because: (no reason given)
edit on 2-12-2013 by hammanderr because:
struggling with the quoting