It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They found the PASSPORT! (so why not black boxes?)
Pasport found!Satam Al Suqami's remarkably undamaged passport
November 5, 1998-September 24, 2000: 9/11 Hijacker Al Suqami Frequently Travels around Middle East and AsiaEdit event
Satam Al Suqami.
Satam Al Suqami. [Source: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division]
On August 11, 1998, 9/11 hijacker Satam Al Suqami is issued a Saudi Arabian passport. [FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 10/2001, PP. 29 pdf file] This passport will allegedly be discovered in the wreckage of the 9/11 attacks in New York, allowing investigators an unusually detailed glimpse into the movements of one of the hijackers. While a majority of the hijackers seem to have traveled little prior to coming to the US, Al Suqami travels widely:
bullet November 5, 1998: He enters and departs Jordan, enters Syria.
bullet November 11, 1998: departs Syria; enters and departs Jordan.
bullet November 12, 1998: enters Saudi Arabia.
bullet February 19, 1999: enters Saudi Arabia.
bullet February 24, 1999: enters and departs Jordan; enters Syria.
bullet February 25, 1999: departs Saudi Arabia.
bullet March 7, 1999: departs Syria.
bullet March 8, 1999: enters Jordan.
bullet May 13, 1999: departs Bahrain.
bullet May 15, 1999: enters Saudi Arabia.
bullet January 18, 2000: enters United Arab Emirates (UAE).
bullet April 4, 2000: enters UAE.
bullet April 6, 2000: departs UAE.
bullet April 7, 2000: enters Egypt.
bullet April 18, 2000: departs Oman, enters UAE.
bullet July 11, 2000: departs Egypt.
bullet July 12, 2000: enters Malaysia. [FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 10/2001, PP. 33, 37-39, 42, 59-62, 75 pdf file]
On September 24, 2000, Al Suqami enters Turkey and stays there for most of the next six months (see September 24, 2000-April 1, 2001). Then he will travel to Malaysia again before finally flying to the US. The above records are obviously incomplete as there are sometimes records of him leaving a country without entering it or vice versa. His travels to Afghanistan and Pakistan are also not mentioned, as there was probably an effort to keep them out of his passport. In 2007, al-Qaeda leader Luai Sakra will claim that Al Suqami was not just another hijacker but led a group of the hijackers. The release of Al Suqami’s passport records in 2008 will help corroborate that claim.
Let's see how many things made it out the building from the plane impacts..
It's the single item from WTC1, to the left.
That's his passport. Found!
Question: Was it a very windy day, on September 11th, 2001? (anyone know, I've got to go to bed now...g'night)
You don't think it a trifle that it is so
easy to see beyond the official narrative, do you?
9/11 is a glass onion. At the very core is media fakery
including computer generated plane crashes and building
It doesn't make sense to randy, an obviously seasoned
professional, to watch a plane dissolve into a building like
that because he is watching an animation where the laws of physics
don't need to hold.
It doesn't make sense to all the architects and engineers to
watch two buildings disintegrate like that because again they
are watching an animation where the laws of physics don't
need to hold.
But this non-sense appears to make sense to scepticoverlord, wmd,
zaphod etc., and about that, there is nothing to be done.
I urge all to look at the two images I re-posted earlier again and
try and reconcile them to yourselves. You will not be able to.
reply to post by OneFreeMan
This is not a no planer (NRPT) thread, I'm sorry. Please offer your hypothesis were it's permitted, in the regular "legitimate" 9/11 Conspiracies Forum. Thanks. No hard feelings though. NAM
reply to post by wmd_2008
You aint seen nuth'n yet! Just wait until we look at the evidence of super-high temperatures from the CD of the twin towers, as well as a certain indestructible "fluttering" passport..
You aint seen nuth'n yet!
Let's just stick the accumulating facts in evidence.
It requires that we believe in and accept impossible things, even things that cannot be reconciled with the physical laws of the universe.
reply to post by NewAgeMan
How can we stick to facts, when neither side can agree on those facts? Or are we sticking to non-OS facts?