Uh... just how is it eroding our second ammendment rights by banning assault weapons? There wasn't a national emergency at the time which infringed upon our national security, nor do I see the need for assault weapons as a means of self-defense. Sure it is important as of now, however, do you really need 30 rounds per minute? Some people have no logistics here...

Ermm....Hitler had German blood (i think, im not sure)
Anywas, Arnie will run i think because the republicans will change it so he can..if Arnie ran, he would win

I take it you believe most American voters are profoundly stupefied?

... if not stupid to begin with?

... No comment.

NWObringer says:

"Uh... just how is it eroding our second ammendment rights by banning assault weapons?"

Well, let's see if we can work this through together. The Second Amendment says that "...the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Infringed means lessened or impacted. Taking away the right to keep and bear "Assault weapons" means that our right to keep and bear arms is lessened, right? I mean, becauase we can't keep and bear some arms, right?

So that's how banning some guns is eroding our Second Amendment rights.

That wasn't so hard to figure out, right?

Of course, if you're in favor of a government which is out to disarm its citizens -- in other words, if you're a big NWO fan -- then I suppose the Second Amendment doesn't mean that much to you.