posted on Nov, 29 2013 @ 04:40 PM
Here is the problem with legal immunity.
The educational system has done a stellar job of eliminating any kind of moral compass from most people. The officials have then done an even better
job of picking out those with zero moral compass as their staff.
This means that when a person who has a gun and authority over others is not held to the same legal standard as the rest of us is free to pepper spray
people in the face because he feels like it, or wants to teach them a lesson. The lesson giver in these cases has no need for a moral compass because
the law says he's fine to do as he pleases. What relying on the "law" as the moral standard does is fully and completely eliminate any need for a
moral compass. With regard to any moral issue one simply says: "damn it, is it legal or not?!" There is large class of people, especially the
"official" class for which this is the only issue at all. Worse, if it isn't legal then go to the king and get him to make it legal - or vice
The result is amoral authority figures. Those they come in contact with have no recourse in either the legal world or the moral world. When this
happens the cattle simply obey the wrangler without a fuss, as the wrangler is ordained as the bringer of control. Ask yourself, "what right does the
cow have protest the wranglers morality and treatment?" Then ask yourself: "how am I different from cattle?"