It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OrphanApology
Here's the Salon article that has the breakdown. www.salon.com...
Don't care for that site but it has them in a nifty go-to location.
Also BibleGateway.com has the bible online if you feel like reading it.
edit on 1-12-2013 by OrphanApology because: Be nice Jette.
Grimpachi
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
Are you seriously trying to justify the book and the people who wrote and follow it to the point of killing their child even adopted ones because …err..well “at least it isn’t abortion”?
That’s exactly how your post reads to me maybe I am alone in that thought but it seems like you are making equivocations.
I am sorry but I have no idea why abortion is even being brought up except maybe because Hana the girl that was tortured and murdered was adopted by the ones who killed her.
I am confused are you defending the book and the people behind and following it or not?
I hope you are not simply thread drifting because this is a serious issue and believe me I have restrained myself from saying some choice things tied to religion in this thread in hopes it could remain on topic.
edit on 1-12-2013 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)
For your review
This website is hilArious.
Here they criticize ChristiAns for viewing their child As their property, yet in Another Article they defend Abortion by essentiAlly sAying the fetus is the womAn's body And therefore her property . . . . They Also support post birth Abortions . . . .
Of course this is All coming from the Atheist Acdemic left, According to SlAte.
In their defense slAte does Acknowledge thAt it is one crAzy justificAtion for infAntiside.
After-Birth Abortion
The pro-choice case for infanticide.
By William Saletan
An eye for an eye is not a Christian teaching . . . . you need to better educate yourself on this.
. . .
The world is full of sick people who claim to be things that they are not.
-FBB
OrphanApology
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
The bible does promote child abuse. This is a topic about a Christian book that also promotes child abuse.
This isn't about atheists, obscure ideas, or anything else.
Also, it is not a stretch. Your rose colored glasses in regard to what's in the bible is what's a stretch. I would recommend reading the bible and actually researching the verses a bit before informing everyone how loving the new testament is in comparison to the old one. It isn't.
Destruction of a whole city includes the death and suffering of innocent children. If you don't think that's the case then that probably explains why so many Christians supported bombing the # out of Iraq.
The people who authored this book take a very literal interpretation to the bible as can be seen if you research them for five minutes. Unlike most believers they probably have read the bible a few times. Because of that and probably their own history of religious and physical abuse, they now wrote a great follow up that many follow.dedit on 1-12-2013 by OrphanApology because: d
Grimpachi
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
Are you seriously trying to justify the book and the people who wrote and follow it to the point of killing their child even adopted ones because …err..well “at least it isn’t abortion”?
That’s exactly how your post reads to me maybe I am alone in that thought but it seems like you are making equivocations.
Grimpachi
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
Then remain consistent. You remind me of groups that preach one thing then turn around and advocate another not realizing they are the same thing.
Opps..I may have hit a nerve with that but it remains true.