I have never bashed the bible for its accuracy or inaccuracy yet only for its legitimacy as God's word. There is overwhelming Biblical evidence that the Ark of the Covenant was structurally designed to act both as an alien transmitter-capacitor and a weapon. The Ark, lethal if touched, was used to communicate with what masqueraded as God; aliens posing as God, requested a contrivance built, which would eventually also aid Israelites when it was carried into battles. "And they shall make an Ark of #tim wood, two cubits and a half shall be the length thereof, and a cubit and a half the breadth thereof, and a cubit and a half the height thereof. 'And thou shalt overlay it with pure gold, within and without shalt thou overlay it, and shalt make upon it a crown of gold around and all about." One of the Gold plates was positively charged and one was negatively charged and together they formed the condenser. If one of the cherubim's positioned above the Mercy Seat acted as a magnet, then one has the rudimentary requirements of a two way communication set. The 'Lord' even detailed what clothing should be worn when consulting the Ark, so that no interference would be encountered when talking through the device, and to also likely limit the risk of electrocution. Further proof of the Ark's functions can be found in the First Book Of Samuel, Chapter 3:3, when the Ark directly speaks to Samuel: "And ere the lamp of God went out in the temple of the Lord, where the Ark of God was, and Samuel was laid to sleep. 'That the Lord called Samuel, and he answered here am I. 'And he ran unto Eli, and said here am I, for thou calledst me. And he said. I called not, lie down again. And he went and lay down". This repeated itself on two more occasions and eventually Eli realized that the Lord was speaking to Samuel via the Ark, which he then told to Samuel, and on the fourth occasion Samuel was able to converse with the Lord, directly through this contrivance. The only persons in the house at the time were Eli and Samuel, and it is quite blatant that it was indeed the Ark which 'spoke' to Samuel. This fuels the argument that the Ark , an alien invention, would have been an unseemly tool for the all powerful true God of the Universe; HE would not need a technological artifice such as a Three-in One communication device set, a religious receptacle and a weapon of destruction. The Ark had these uses; at all of the times of communication with 'God' and at the times of great battles, the Ark was invariably present. Unfortunately, not everyone had the same opinion of the Ark as divine in intent. David decided for safety's sake, to 'steal away with it', with Uzzah's help, with tragic consequences as retold in the second book of Samuel, Chapter 6: "And when they came to Nachons threshing-floor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the Ark of God, and took hold of it, for the oxen shook it. 'And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah, and God smote him there for his error, and there he died by the Ark of God." Quite clearly the Ark was carrying a massive electrical charge which killed Uzzah on the spot when he touched it.Theologians mince words. Otherwise, why didn't the God of the Universe, our True Lord, kill Uzzah for attempting to sequester the Ark at the outset; why did He have to wait until he actually touched it? Perhaps, it's because 'God' as described in the Hebrew Old Testament was not remotely the omniscient, omnipresent God of the universe but instead a crafty, manipulative completely in charactor masquerading alien. Good technology looks just like magic. Divine magic that tells you so and can reach out and bite you is from quite a God!
Jesus did not identify the Holy Father with a specific name, unalike the ancient demiurges that desired to be worshipped within established temples, altars with sacrifices performed ritually in their 'honour'. Jesus never set out to establish any of these things—not one single building (that today comprises a spirit of re-legioning), that still honours these 'lower' deities with the upholding paganistic traditions of old dedicated to them.
Yup yup... I fully endorse this thread S&F Theres only 4 books needed in the bible..... the rest is just a damn good story
As far as the Ark of the Covenant, I believe it is only one of many graven images created by Yahweh in the bible, Jesus being another example. The only true image of God is the one that we all have, the light of Truth within all of us. We see this light every waking moment of our lives. Light is the most important means of information we have, it is what we rely on most to stay alive. The Light we have is the Word of God because it is pure information, and we are the Word made flesh because we are fleshy creatures that have the Light (Word) of God within us.
Which is why Jesus said that the "law" was to remain till "heaven and earth" pass away. ...etc. See, you can't exactly separate Jesus from the Israelite religious tradition within which he worked. Quoting from sites like ufodigest doesn't really help your case, either.
I Samuel 14/5: 'And when the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great shout...' 4/8: '...who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty Gods? these are the Gods that smote the Egyptians...' In II Samuel 6/6-7...a simple man named Uzzah, disregarded warnings, touched the Ark improperly and was electrocuted! '...Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God.' The man attempted to place it back on the ox-drawn cart and died. They had no concept of high-voltage. 6/9: 'And David was afraid of the Lord that day.' The story of Jericho is told in the Book of Joshua. The actual site of Jericho was found. The stone walls were over ten feet thick. What could bring down massive walls? According to the Old Testament, it was the power of the Lord. Marching around the stone fort and blowing trumpets could not possibly shatter such walls. The Ark of the Covenant was there and responsible for 'tumbling down' the walls of Jericho. There are numerous references to, again, a great shout.'
The aim by this effort is to further highlight in examining the disparity (linked below) between the ways of a 'lording god of destruction, murder and lies' and the Father of Truth and Creation outlined within the Bible. In deed, may we come to recognize them by their fruit (or lack thereof)!
51 Now it came to pass, when the time had come for Him to be received up, that He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem, 52 and sent messengers before His face. And as they went, they entered a village of the Samaritans, to prepare for Him. 53 But they did not receive Him, because His face was set for the journey to Jerusalem. 54 And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, “Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?”
55 But He turned and rebuked them, and said, “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. 56 For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.” And they went to another village.
“Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil? Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.” John 8:43-51 (KJV)
The ruling powers and their agents have structured scriptural texts for purpose of deliberate organised 're-legioning' (blending of the Truth with devilish distortion)
toward a negative indoctrination, as with all major religions maligned with truth melded in with lies to attract our souls with mass effect…
Some interesting information regarding the 'prized' Israelite ark of the covenant 'commanded' to be built as an advanced technological weapon of destruction and communication by Biblical account.
So what did Jesus have to say about the 'lord' that the Isis-Ra-Elite bloodlines followed in falsely led blood letting sacrifice and worship?
Let us return to the aforementioned rulers, so that we may offer some explanation of them. Now, when the seven rulers were cast down from their heavens onto the earth, they made for themselves angels, numerous, demonic, to serve them. And the latter instructed mankind in many kinds of error and magic and potions and worship of idols and spilling of blood and altars and temples and sacrifices and libations to all the spirits of the earth, having their coworker fate, who came into existence by the concord between the gods of injustice and justice.
if only people would search for the truth and discernment, instead of clumping everything together as being all from God, then they might be able to get closer to the bigger picture.
Psalm 82 King James Version (KJV)
82 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods. 2 How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Selah. 3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. 4 Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked. 5 They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course. 6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. 7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. 8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.
Fantastic post. Thank you for taking the time to put in all that good effort with pertinent scripture included. We are very much in alignment with our perspectives, and see we both share signatures from the book of John also.
Glad you touched on the Gnostics also as they will form part basis of the next thread.
Yahweh merged with El in the OT?
"When El Elyon gave to the nations their inheritance,
when he separated the sons of men,
he fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.
For Yahweh's portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted inheritance."
I think it’s high time that the sewage blocking the drain was removed completely, so that the waters can flow more freely and abundantly…
I’m glad someone out there, shares my perspective. What frustrates me more than anything, is that apologists today, are still defending the evil actions perpetrated in the OT
And also, according to the Hebrew Scriptures, its the God “Ale” or “El” who liberates the Israelites during the Exodus. And yet during Gods conversation with Abraham, God asserts that He is Yahweh, and that he was also the God Ale/El, who brought them out of the wilderness…etc (Exodus 6:2-3) 2 ways of looking at this… Either they’re both one and the same God, who consistently takes the rap for some other entity, committing evil. Or they’re 2 different Gods, with one (Yahweh) committing various atrocities, while trying to supplant the other “El Elyon”… I have to say though, just looking at this logically…I don’t really see why God would change his name, or have to assert that He was the same God who brought them out of the wilderness, and that he now goes by the Name (Yahweh) etc… And it seems to me, that the way the above verse is structured, it seems to be more suggestive, that Yahweh is one of these “Sons of God”, who is allotted a portion. My thinking being, that the Most high God (El Elyon), would not need a portion, or even have someone else allot him a portion to begin with, for surely ALL the people, would be His inheritance, and not just a select few!
Jesus was not a pacifist. “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword."(Mt 10:34) The sword is obviously a metaphor for violent conflict juxtaposed with peace, so he was teaching he did not come to bring non-violence but war... and in the battle of Armageddon will ensue upon his return: “Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! The one sitting on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war."(Re 19:11)
Do not be deceived by the hippie Jesus of theological liberalism, he is coming back to make war.
Perhaps you might read more then a single verse in the chapter if you actually want to understand the meaning...
The sword is a symbolic representation of the division his teaching creates... Oh... and revelation was written by an old man in a cave... I wouldn't put too much stock in that book...