Leading geneticist says we are a hybrid of Pigs and Chimps

page: 19
42
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 9 2013 @ 08:32 PM
link   
I thought along these lines. However, from my understanding, when the "GODS" made domestic animals the made the pig. The pig was made from human genes and common boars.

This is why our skin is so similar.

This is why pigs are too smart.

THIS IS WHY MUSLIMS SAY PIG IS DIRTY ANIMAL, because we are eating some form of canabalism.

Big Question is, how were we formed first. Most histroy states some form of primate and "GOD" dna.

Will we ever know the truth or are we destined to speculate.




posted on Dec, 9 2013 @ 08:48 PM
link   
reply to post by REalBEL
 


Humans and pigs have NO commonality.

It does not matter what Muslims say.

Animals and humans may have SIMILAR biological functions and cell structure etc, but have absolutely NO common ancestor.

There is strong delusion in today's humans due to ignorance of spiritual knowledge.



posted on Dec, 9 2013 @ 08:48 PM
link   

REalBELTHIS IS WHY MUSLIMS SAY PIG IS DIRTY ANIMAL, because we are eating some form of canabalism.


actually the reason pork is considered unclean by Muslims and Jews had to do with not really understanding basic hygiene and the fact that close contact to domesticated pigs brought about diseases that were easily transmitted through the local populace. eventually it became a public health issue and the easiest solution was calling the meat unclean and forbidding it.



posted on Dec, 9 2013 @ 08:50 PM
link   

GargIndia
reply to post by REalBEL
 


Humans and pigs have NO commonality.

It does not matter what Muslims say.

Animals and humans may have SIMILAR biological functions and cell structure etc, but have absolutely NO common ancestor.

There is strong delusion in today's humans due to ignorance of spiritual knowledge.


Id dare say the delusion is as strong if not stronger by the devout who are ignorant to modern science. saying that all mammals do not have a common ancestor is a bit like pointing to the sky and trying to convince me that its beige or mauve.



posted on Dec, 9 2013 @ 08:58 PM
link   
reply to post by peter vlar
 


Ok, let us hear your modern science.

What evidence do you have???

And be to the point here as I will shred each and every of your argument.



posted on Dec, 10 2013 @ 01:27 PM
link   

GargIndia
reply to post by peter vlar
 


Ok, let us hear your modern science.

What evidence do you have???

And be to the point here as I will shred each and every of your argument.


Maximum-likelihood and bayesian trees from both nuclear and mitochondrial genes that give 100% bootstrap support and posterior probability for the monophyly of mammals?



posted on Dec, 11 2013 @ 09:45 PM
link   
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Is that proof?

These are theories.

You can create any theory and choose evidence to support it.

Anyway I want more than a single statement - offer experiments and results, as science should be.



posted on Dec, 11 2013 @ 09:47 PM
link   
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Create a human out of pig and chimp under "controlled scientific conditions" and report back when you are done.

And stop offering crazy theories.



posted on Dec, 12 2013 @ 12:52 PM
link   

GargIndia
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Is that proof?

Yes, extremely strong evidence.



These are theories.

No, they're trees with extremely good statistical support. Theories are something completely different.



You can create any theory and choose evidence to support it.

For something to be a theory, there has to be a way to test it and show it wrong. These trees are extremely robust tests for the monophyly of mammals.



Anyway I want more than a single statement - offer experiments and results, as science should be.

I could link some papers, but what would be the point? You thought that phylogenetic trees are "theories"..
edit on 12-12-2013 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2013 @ 12:53 PM
link   

GargIndia
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Create a human out of pig and chimp under "controlled scientific conditions" and report back when you are done.

And stop offering crazy theories.

I've been arguing this entire thread how ridiculous the claim that humans are chimp-pig hybrids is, and how open access data clearly shows that this claim is nonsense. So, why would you expect me to create a human out of a pig and a chimp?
edit on 12-12-2013 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2013 @ 02:54 PM
link   

rhinoceros

GargIndia
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Create a human out of pig and chimp under "controlled scientific conditions" and report back when you are done.

And stop offering crazy theories.

I've been arguing this entire thread how ridiculous the claim that humans are chimp-pig hybrids is, and how open access data clearly shows that this claim is nonsense. So, why would you expect me to create a human out of a pig and a chimp?
edit on 12-12-2013 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)

Perhaps you've shown so much expertise here, the poster figured if anyone could do it, you could?

Harte



posted on Dec, 16 2013 @ 12:43 PM
link   
reply to post by GargIndia
 




You can create any theory and choose evidence to support


or in the case of religion create a dogma and then refuse to acknowledge all the evidence that contradicts it.



posted on Dec, 17 2013 @ 03:26 AM
link   

rhinoceros

GargIndia
reply to post by peter vlar
 


Ok, let us hear your modern science.

What evidence do you have???

And be to the point here as I will shred each and every of your argument.


Maximum-likelihood and bayesian trees from both nuclear and mitochondrial genes that give 100% bootstrap support and posterior probability for the monophyly of mammals?


LMAO

Im not sure if that sentence actually means something or not as I have no idea what most of those words are but I pissed myself laughing when I read it.
If BS comedy gold

If true, talk about using a napalm flame thrower to light a ciggie.

I would love it if it was BS and the other dude was arguing about its validity like he knew what you were talking about, please tell me thats the case, pls pls pls



posted on Dec, 24 2013 @ 01:54 PM
link   

GargIndia
reply to post by REalBEL
 


Humans and pigs have NO commonality.

It does not matter what Muslims say.

Animals and humans may have SIMILAR biological functions and cell structure etc, but have absolutely NO common ancestor.

There is strong delusion in today's humans due to ignorance of spiritual knowledge.


Funny that you'd make a statement like that and then claim the scientists are the ignorant ones.


Ok, let us hear your modern science.

What evidence do you have???

And be to the point here as I will shred each and every of your argument.


Usually when folks say stuff like this, they plan to rely strictly on semantics arguments that have nothing to do with any science. Looking at your following posts, I am right.

So what evidence do YOU have to suggest evolution is false or that ID is true? And be to the point here as I will shred each and every argument, without using logical fallacies and lies as you have.
edit on 24-12-2013 by Barcs because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
42
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in

join