It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
chr0naut
reply to post by truthseeker84
Also, Rather than using WPA2, you could try WPA which your PS3 should be happy with. It is more secure than WAP and should consume less router CPU than WPA2. If your AP's firmware has not been updated and is an older 'n' implementation, then WPA may give you the same speeds as WPA2 (no guarantees, though).
Also, ensure that WMM is on! Wireless N needs it.
You should also try turning off Channel Bonding (ie: set Channel width to 20MHz) if your WiFi signal is anything less than 'excellent'.
parad0x122
"WAP" is NOT an encryption protocol. I'm assuming you probably meant WEP, in which case what you are saying is then only partially true. One encryption algorithm does not use more or less "router CPU" then another, it's simply a different method of authentication.
First, most SOHO equipment (AP / CLIENTS) aren't designed with high end processing chips. You also MUST consider its not just the router you need to consider. When your wireless client is sending frames, its must encrypt them and also decrypt them when receiving them. So keep that in mind...
WEP - Very little security over head. Its a static RC4 key which can be 64 or 128 bit.
WPA/TKIP (PSK)- You have to remember there is the authenication and then encryption.
AUTHN-- It uses a 4 way handshake, this process itself should take no more then 100ms and in most cases like 20ms. After the 4 way handshake is complete it.
ENCRYP-- WPA retains the use of RC4 but adds features designed to address the deficiencies in the way that WEP uses the cipher.WPA lengthens the Initialisation Vector (IV) to 48 bits and the master key to 128 bits. Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) generates different keys for each client and alters keys for each successive packet.
WPA2/AES (PSK) -- Again uses 4 way handshake. Same time as above. WPA2 uses the Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol (CCMP) protocol, based on the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm for authentication and data encryption. TKIP greatly increases the difficulty of intercepting wireless traffic over WEP, but CCMP is more secure than the combination of RC4 and TKIP. Since CCMP requires more processor cycles than RC4, an upgrade to WPA2 may require replacement of APs or client wireless interfaces.
staple
It is probably a setting like you think. Wireless is funny. If your neighbor is broadcasting on the same channels you will see a performance drop. It is subject to interference.
I would download a wifi analyzer and see how crowded your spectrum is. If there is any channels not being used I would set the WAP to use those and retest.
I see that it has dual 2.5 and 5Ghz. Give each one a unique SSID and retest.
You can give them the same SSID but your iStuff probably won't tell you the difference.
My laptop will not connect to a 5Ghz but my Android will. Laptop just does not see the SSID.
I short while ago I had a client that had his computers and phone connected to his Dlink router and it all worked. Then he moved offices and someone switched his router from 2.5Ghz to 5Ghz only. Everything still worked except when he brought his Ipad in. It could not see past 2.5Ghz. I came in and moved the switch(it had a physical switch for 2.5-5Ghz) and then his Ipad connected.
From the support PDF for your router
Select the Channel Width:
Auto 20/40 - This is the default setting. Select if you are using both 802.11n and non-802.11n wireless devices.
20MHz - Select if you are not using any 802.11n wireless clients.
40MHz - Select if using only 802.11n wireless clients.edit on 11/26/2013 by staple because: I added confusion
chr0naut
reply to post by truthseeker84
The world we live in is becoming a noisier place all the time, even in radio spectrum.
Perhaps the difference in performance is due to some radio interference in the (very narrow) range that WiFi uses.
If you or a neighbor sets up things like cordless phones (which channel hop all over the show and are not WiFi friendly at all) or another access point somewhere in range, these can interfere with your AP.
Also, Rather than using WPA2, you could try WPA which your PS3 should be happy with. It is more secure than WEP and should consume less router CPU than WPA2. If your AP's firmware has not been updated and is an older 'n' implementation, then WPA may give you the same speeds as WPA2 (no guarantees, though).
Also, ensure that WMM is on! Wireless N needs it.
You should also try turning off Channel Bonding (ie: set Channel width to 20MHz) if your WiFi signal is anything less than 'excellent'.
edit on 26/11/2013 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
CardiffGiant
i was going to try and help but it is clear you know more than myself. i dont want to derail your thread but i have a question.
how do you get speeds upwards of 70 mbps? even the speeds in the 40's?
are you paying some premium prices to the provider?
i get around 18 mbps download speeds and i am happy with that but if i could double those speeds.
parad0x122
chr0naut
reply to post by truthseeker84
Also, Rather than using WPA2, you could try WPA which your PS3 should be happy with. It is more secure than WAP and should consume less router CPU than WPA2. If your AP's firmware has not been updated and is an older 'n' implementation, then WPA may give you the same speeds as WPA2 (no guarantees, though).
Also, ensure that WMM is on! Wireless N needs it.
You should also try turning off Channel Bonding (ie: set Channel width to 20MHz) if your WiFi signal is anything less than 'excellent'.
Yeah, a lot of this is just plain erroneous. I'm a systems administrator for a living and can tell you the following:
"WAP" is NOT an encryption protocol. I'm assuming you probably meant WEP, in which case what you are saying is then only partially true. One encryption algorithm does not use more or less "router CPU" then another, it's simply a different method of authentication.
Also another tid bit, I've installed my fair share of D-Link DIR-6 series routers recently, and have had nearly 30% of them die within minutes of powering them on. I don't know if this is some sort of firmware issue, or a hardware manufacturing defect, but a lot of them have shown GREAT instability with even the most basic configurations.
My advice: Take back your D-Link and pick up either a Cisco/Linksys Dual-Band router, or a decent Netgear Dual-Band router, and start from scratch. Keep it simple, setup a wireless network with a secure password, using a standard encryption method such as WPA2 TKIP or WPA2 AES, then test everything.Also, if you have a laptop available, running NetStumbler will help you determine the least-populated signal-band in your area.
truthseeker84
But for the life of me, I don't know how to make 5Ghz available
truthseeker84
I cannot do WPA2 AES, because the PS3 (Not sure about PS4) will not take WPA2 with AES.
chr0naut
Since CCMP requires more processor cycles than RC4, an upgrade to WPA2 may require replacement of APs or client wireless interfaces.
edit on 26/11/2013 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
_BoneZ_
truthseeker84
But for the life of me, I don't know how to make 5Ghz available
That's because a previous poster looked at the wrong router and misinformed you. The DIR-655 does not have dual-band radios. It only has the 2.4 GHz radio. The DIR-825 is the dual-band router with both 2.4 GHz and 5 Ghz radios (which is the one I have).
truthseeker84
I cannot do WPA2 AES, because the PS3 (Not sure about PS4) will not take WPA2 with AES.
My PS3 is connected via WPA2 AES just fine. Make sure you have a WPA2 AES password set up and are typing it in correctly when you go to connect with your PS3. Here's a walkthough:
support.us.playstation.com...
As far as faster wireless, I was getting 150 Mb/s when I was using a wireless USB stick a few years ago. I'm no longer using the stock router firmware, so I don't have the same screens as you for setting up wireless, however the firmware I'm using is pretty close.
Make sure your wireless is set up with these settings:
- Wireless Mode: AP
- Wireless Network Mode: Mixed
- Channel Width: Dynamic
- Wireless Channel: Auto
You also want to make sure that your router is putting out enough signal strength. There's a setting somewhere to adjust signal strength. You also want to check the settings of your wireless devices and make sure they are set up to use the full bandwidth of the wireless spectrum.
Hope this was helpful. I'll be checking back to see if you have any more questions.
I forgot to add this little bit of information:
Wireless G tops out at 54 Mbs, so getting 40 was close to the max as you were likely running wireless G on one or more of your devices. If you have a wireless N device, it will top out at 72 Mbs on the 20 MHz channel width, or 150 Mbs on the 40 MHz channel width. If you have your channel width set to "dynamic" as I stated above, you'll use both if your router supports using both at the same time.
Otherwise, if your devices are wireless G, you only have the 20 MHz setting. If your "network mode" is set to "mixed", you can use G and N at the same time, however your G devices will only top out at 54 Mbs (40-ish real-world), and your N devices will top out at 150 Mbs (75-130 real world).
edit on 26-11-2013 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)
Biigs
The moral of the story should be that, nothing works as good as a real wired connection.
The very second you introduce radio signals you introduce a loss of speed or latency. Its just the facts.
truthseeker84
Again, after hard reset, the DIR-655 caps at 20 mbps on all devices.