It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Quantum mechanics inherently demonstrates that there is no such thing as fate or destiny
It has been experimentally proven that all time (past, present & future) exist simultaneously and statically.
ChaoticOrder
reply to post by chr0naut
It has been experimentally proven that all time (past, present & future) exist simultaneously and statically.
Experimentally proven? More like theoretically asserted... can you name the experiment you are referring to?
Astyanax
reply to post by chr0naut
It has been experimentally proven that all time (past, present & future) exist simultaneously and statically.
Do you mean this (more explanation here)? It's very dodgy; actually, despite the sales-talk in the abstract, it proves only that time does not exist to an observer outside the universe — an observer who, from our point of view, can never be known to exist. Within the universe, the appearance of temporality, illusive though it may be, is perfect.
As you may read in my first post in the thread, I pretty much agree with the proposition that all states of the universe exist in superposition. But I know of no experiment that 'proves' this; indeed I cannot think how one could possibly design an experiment to investigate it.
There is strong theoretical evidence that it is the case, but experimental proof? I don't think so.
Chance never ceases to be a factor, of course, but events are very predictable — because they are predetermined by other events we call 'causes'. In our world, for example, whales don't suddenly drop out of the sky. In a world where quantum randomness existed at large scales, they might. Anything might happen, no matter how unlikely.
ANY amount of true randomness in a system will stop one from predicting exactly how that system will evolve.
The thing is, at the end of the day, we can pretty well predict how most physical processes will turn out, most of the time.
We may debate the niceties, but the universe is rather obviously nonrandom, wouldn't you say?
Blue Shift
So in many ways, it's the present that doesn't exist, as the only things we can really be sure of are things that happened, and things that have a high probability of happening. There is no "now." There is only remembrance of things past, and anticipation of the future.
"Now", or the "present", is the only thing that exists. The ongoing state of ever-changing "now" is the only thing that we experience. Our remembrance of things past is really remembrance of a change in state, which is all that exists.
We can never be sure of things that happened, or things that haven't happened. We can only be sure that things are happening.
AlienView
"The ongoing state of ever-changing "now" is the only thing that we experience"
I have a big problem with that statement. What is an ever-changing now? If it is ever-changing when is it now?
FREEZE TIME and show me NOW. What is this frozen now time? It can't be and now can't be - it is already over as soon as you try to prove it exists. Unless you can demonstrate a universe existent without time you can not have a now - now is already past as soon as you try to claim it exists. Now, whether the future actually exists can be debated - what can't be debated is its necessity for existence to continue - without a future there is no present and no past and we can all cash in our chips and go home - the game of existence will end.
Itisnowagain
AlienView
"The ongoing state of ever-changing "now" is the only thing that we experience"
I have a big problem with that statement. What is an ever-changing now? If it is ever-changing when is it now?
FREEZE TIME and show me NOW. What is this frozen now time? It can't be and now can't be - it is already over as soon as you try to prove it exists. Unless you can demonstrate a universe existent without time you can not have a now - now is already past as soon as you try to claim it exists. Now, whether the future actually exists can be debated - what can't be debated is its necessity for existence to continue - without a future there is no present and no past and we can all cash in our chips and go home - the game of existence will end.
Can you ever say that you are not present (now)?
Now is where all appears and disappears.
Now cannot be escaped - now is constantly appearing different but that which sees that it changes never changes.
AlienView
Itisnowagain
AlienView
"The ongoing state of ever-changing "now" is the only thing that we experience"
I have a big problem with that statement. What is an ever-changing now? If it is ever-changing when is it now?
FREEZE TIME and show me NOW. What is this frozen now time? It can't be and now can't be - it is already over as soon as you try to prove it exists. Unless you can demonstrate a universe existent without time you can not have a now - now is already past as soon as you try to claim it exists. Now, whether the future actually exists can be debated - what can't be debated is its necessity for existence to continue - without a future there is no present and no past and we can all cash in our chips and go home - the game of existence will end.
Can you ever say that you are not present (now)?
Now is where all appears and disappears.
Now cannot be escaped - now is constantly appearing different but that which sees that it changes never changes.
No, now does not exist. I can not conceive of anything, being, or entity that exists in a timeless unchanging void
- You can not freeze time or anything existent where time exists. Now if you can somehow argue that time is illusory and nothing is happening beware that you will have to explain the nature of existence independently of time. Aristotle referred to an 'unmoved mover', religions refer to god - these entities are speculative and you can say exist outside of time - buy man's being and state of consciousness is stuck in a timed, ever changing state of existence whose reality does not allow for time to freeze.
AlienView
No, now does not exist. I can not conceive of anything, being, or entity that exists in a timeless unchanging void