It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
His mom, Nancy Lanza -- who Lanza killed at her house before his school rampage -- would jump in and answer for her son.
He's not in school. I'm homeschooling.
Lanza would not say a word. Every now and then, he'd mumble something. His mother was the boss. She'd pipe up when the barber asked Adam if he liked his haircut.
I don't like it, Mom would say. Cut it shorter, trim his sideburns.
When the haircut was done, the barber would tell Lanza it was time to get up. But he'd just sit there, like he was still getting clipped.
His mom would grab him by the arm and yank him up.
It's time to go, Adam. Your haircut is done.
The boy would listen to his mother. Always, always, always. Never would he disobey her.
Look folks, the hard reality is that a strange kid went off the rails, had easy access to guns and killed a bunch of helpless people. Be in the wrong Walmart at the wrong time and it could be your death photo on 4chan.
Much easier to believe in a logical though diabolical conspiracy than in a world where random s*** happens to people for no logical reason. Also easier and more satisfying to live in that world when you know you are smart enough to recognize conspiracy while others are sheeple.
i want to know is why not release calls between the police and who rung them to alert them of the situation? yet lots of people was killed in 9/11 and the plastered pictures and recordings all over the media be it tv , internet etc very similar situations people was killed families effected
A couple/few hrs ago I logged on to Yahoo news, and to my surprise I saw a headline that read, "Judge orders release of Sandy Hook 911 calls." Well, it's gone now! I didn't do a search to see if it's still available or if it's been taken down, because I'm on my very old desktop and I hate it--it freezes almost every time I open a page & I have to reboot if all else fails. However, I did see the headline.. I could not open the page.
It's likely someone has already posted it here & I simply haven't seen it yet, or missed it, but anyway-the judge ordered the release of the 911 calls-time will tell.
I can't go against T&C so Will only add this as Being a little odd about The Hero teacher:
Kaitlin M. Roig
reply to post by BillN
Really Newtown ehhhh? Well are we lucky to have someone on the spot , amazingly lucky , do you live across the road?
I detect some sarcasm. Have the mods check my IP if you think I'm BSing. I've got nothing to gain here.
I think we're seeing the REAL reason for all these conspiracy discussions; abject paranoia. Everything just has to be some sinister secret plot to take over the world to certain people, so when a massive event like the Newtown shooting occurs such people will naturally see it through conspiracy colored glasses and they will naturally see hidden clues all over the place that simply isn't there. A cigar simply can't be just a cigar.
I myself live maybe thirty minutes from Newtown myself so seeing someone else from Connecticut logging onto ATS is about as incredible as seeing someone buying milk at the grocery store. Insinuating that you're some secret agent simply becuase you're in the area is pretty bizarre.
The official government website for the state of Connecticut (ct.gov) lists the drill on their calendar;
only 13 miles away drilling the exact event..
You are deliberately changing your evidence to suit your argument, here. Your own link specifically says it wasn't a drill; it was a conference, and your own link said it wasn't even about school shooters; it was planning for the needs of children to help them survive disasters (I.E. hurricanes). Then you transpose this with an actual school shooter drill, but that was in Putnam, a town on the exact opposite side of the state from where Newtown is.
In short, you are putting independently occurring events together here and connecting the dots to form a picture that you yourself want to see. You're not exactly convincing me of the credibility of your argument, here.
What the article did say is that the judge listened to the tapes and he wants to release it because the tapes confirm the police reacted professionally and properly to the call, and the judge feels the public has a right to know this.
They Used drill footage from that other school on CNN during that sandy hook news and played it off as footage
So, had the police reacted unprofessionally.. the judge would not have wanted the release of these calls?
And whose to say that we will get all of the calls? In your comment you say "call", but we know there were many.
IMO secrecy will always surround the investigation as far as discussing or debating it on here. Those who know there are issues with the sandy hook event cant evidence any debate due to censorship of the evidence that would need to be posted. There are many questions raised by the photographic evidence that simply cant be posted on ATS from photographs of main players apparently appearing elsewhere with different names to absolute evidence of photo shopped or altered photographic evidence.
What's more likely?
Nutjob gets guns in a country where guns are freely available and shoots a bunch of people?
Government spends a zillion dollars on a conspiracy so crap that any one with an internet connection can drive a bus through it?
See also Obama's birth cert and 9/11.
What does 'likely' have to do with anything?
Do you take the governments word on everything just because it's ''Likely''?