It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
poet1b
reply to post by wildespace
And stars have such enormous masses because their structure is plasma.
Fusion takes place in a plasma state. It is pretty obvious.
I don't know who told you that you could read minds, and know what I believe, or why you think you can read my mind, but you aren't even close.
Structure doesn't explain mass.
poet1b
reply to post by wildespace
That is your problem, you want to argue, and I am just trying to have a discussion on Plasma and comets.
What do we know, and more important what don't we know, and the latter is far more extensive than the former.
In physics, mass is a property of a physical body which determines the body's resistance to being accelerated by a force and the strength of its mutual gravitational attraction with other bodies.
The density, or more precisely, the volumetric mass density, of a substance is its mass per unit volume.
Volume is the quantity of three-dimensional space enclosed by some closed boundary, for example, the space that a substance (solid, liquid, gas, or plasma) or shape occupies or contains.
Structure is a fundamental, tangible or intangible notion referring to the recognition, observation, nature, and permanence of patterns and relationships of entities.
poet1b
reply to post by eriktheawful
I am quite familiar with those properties, and nothing I have posted does not fit in with those concepts.
Your problem is that you confuse theories with proven facts.
Sorry, but an electron does have mass, it is just so small that typically it is ignored.
physics.nist.gov...
The concept of the photon is a theory, not proven, even our current model of atomic structure is not proven.
Here is the best link I could find on the subject, for this discussion.
physics.bu.edu...
I don't care what you do for a living, or what degrees you have, if you can't tell the difference between theories and facts, then your grasp of science is weak at best.
The Theory that Plasma creates structures, has far more evidence to back it than the theory of photons. The connection between electricity and plasma has far more evidence backing the science.
If you can't have a discussion about these possibilities, then that is your problem, sorry that you can't get out of the box.
Dear members,
I tried imaging of the ephemeris of C/2012 S1 ISON at 11,000 feet above sea level. There looked to be some faint and vast elongated object near the direction on the frame showing some amount of IFN, integrated flux nebulae, though I can not confirm it the remnant of the comet. The object was faint as IFN.
www.flickr.com...
I will image the ephemeris area again in the coming days, and I may be able to confirm it, if it moved as expected. The object looked vast and faint, and telephoto lens of focal length 150mm - 300mm may be suitable for imaging.
Best Wishes,
hiro
Tallone
... that ISON is MUCH bigger than we were led to believe. I say IS because those fragments are still out there.
Very big metallic comet fragments spreading through space is not good for Earth. You will be aware by now how the fragments of ISON are spreading out, and that the trajectories of Earth and of those fragments are due to intersect. In fact from the rate and scale of dispersion already observable the Earth will almost definitely be travelling through the debris field. People should / need to be aware of this.
Tallone
by way by Paul Wiegert of the University of Western Ontario and used by NASA on their site to which I linked.
It's like a rock.It's not powder. It's a rock.
originally posted by: Tallone
Comet 67P. Another dirty snowball. Oh yeah. Right.
What we have right there is one huge **************G Mountain! No LEss!
I give you, electric comet 67P. A myth buster. Just like ISON was in fact.
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Tallone
Comet 67P. Another dirty snowball. Oh yeah. Right.
What we have right there is one huge **************G Mountain! No LEss!
I give you, electric comet 67P. A myth buster. Just like ISON was in fact.
Explain to me how does a mountain have the density of 0.4 g/cm³, which is less than ice and only slightly higher than cork.
The corpse of your 'mainstream model' is skewered by the evidence in the photos we are seeing.