It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by Trubeeleever
As a complete dumb-ass layman, the question of how water appears on the surface of the comet, when it was once inside is a simple case of thermal dynamics.
As the comet approaches a super hot celestial body like our sun, the comet and every compound within it also super heats. The heavier substances like iron, are reduced to a malleable erupting magma, and force their way to the centre of the corona, while pushing out the gaseous elements like hydrogen and oxygen.
FRACTALS.
The earth has a super heated iron core, while substances like water are displaced to the outer surface. But it's not to say that certain amounts of water are not trapped beneath the surface, but add enough heat, thus turning the entire earth into bubbling iron and gas stew, and the gases will migrate to the surface, while the heavier substance will fight to get to the core.
As the comet rounds the sun, it too becomes a bubbling stew of it's own juices, thermal dynamics push the lighter gases away from the core, but convection currents pull them back, but not all the way, because at the extreme core the densest metals will always dominate.
As the comet rounds the sun and then hides behind another celestial body like The Earth, it cools very quickly in the shadow of the Earth, and the violent eruptions now subside, leaving a brittle crust on the surface.
What astronomers can now see is a quiet sleeping comet with an icy outer surface, but as soon as it reappears out of the shadow of the earth and back into the blazing radioactive heat of the sun it explodes back to life, expelling it's icy crust in an instant, and then returns back to it's former bubbling brewing mass it was only a day or two before.
However, as it leaves our neighborhood and continues its fiery path towards the outer edges of our solar system, and no more celestial bodies to hide behind, it cools at a much much slower rate, therefore allowing the water to seep back to the core, as the molten metal cools slower. An Astronomers view of the comet at this stage would be one of an iron mass, with little water visible.
Whoa ! Gee I can write some B/S when I set my mind to it.edit on 3-12-2013 by Trubeeleever because: Grammatical Corrections.
Tallone
bizarre isn't it, that there are now no images of the progress of the so called ISON debris?
The results of EUVI-B are:
EUVI-B 171 gets darker at 18:14
EUVI-B 195 goes hazy at 18:16
(also has multiple glitches)
EUVI-B 284 goes black at 18:17
EUVI-B 304 glitch at 18:17
Tallone
There have been no images of ISON in perihelion recorded by the satellites.
On November 28, 2013, the SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) spacecraft will off-point at three different positions as Comet ISON moves through perihelion. This website will display near realtime images and movies of this sungrazing comet. Images should begin appearing sometime between 12:45 pm and 1:00 pm ET.
Tallone
It is bizarre isn't it, that there are now no images of the progress of the so called ISON debris?
Tallone
The cameras I have been talking about are those set up to supply close proximity images of the comet in perhelion including approach and departure.
And now you try to weasel out of it (after being caught out) by claiming you were just talking about the SDO alone.
reply to post by wildespace
So, SDO didn't see ISON. What can NASA do about it? Other satellites saw it entering perihelion and exiting it, so we know it was there. Do you think NASA erased the comet from SDO images, or took images when it was not there and put false timestamps? Go on, let your conspiracy-ridden mind run free. Me, I'm happy with the images of ISON we have from SOHO and STEREO, despite all the glitches, image artifacts, and low resolution.
I don't know what NASA did with those images. If anyone does know they are not telling. The point is we are missing extremely valuable images telling us a lot about ISON particularly its shape, whether it is one object or several, and even the possible nature of its make up.
When I see trolling I will not respond. Repeated attempts to divert the thread from the subject, particularly by attempting to provoke constitute trolling to my mind. I will ignore these. I will leave it for others to work their way back over the threads of discussion between posters within the thread and make their own conclusions.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Tallone
When I see trolling I will not respond. Repeated attempts to divert the thread from the subject, particularly by attempting to provoke constitute trolling to my mind. I will ignore these. I will leave it for others to work their way back over the threads of discussion between posters within the thread and make their own conclusions.
So unless someone agrees with you aren't going to reply, is this correct?
Interesting...
Just wondering if it's worth the time to reply anymore, or would I be having a conversation with myself?
I'd say that is a rather unfair response and kind of goes to the heart of what he was saying. Tallone has responded to disagreement quite often, maybe less so on specific predictions but that is nearly irrelevant as hindsight is 20/20 if you know what I mean.