It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
notice how the direction of the squashing is oriented to the center of the image, and the squashing is maximum when bokeh is at the maximum distance from the center, at the right upper corner, while when the disc is near the center, it respects the rounded shape (even when later the camera pans to watch the disc)
www.abovetopsecret.com...
In the void between planets, star systems and galaxies, the temperature in space is generally considered to be 2.725 Kelvin which is -454.72°F (-270.4°C). This is only a very small amount above absolute zero, the coldest possible temperature at which the movement of all matter ceases at -459.67°F (-273.15°C).
But this thread is about what attaches itself to the ISS at 2:54 in the video.
Iqarus
reply to post by gortex
What luiquids are fluent in space?
i found this, which seems to say its pretty darn cold
In the void between planets, star systems and galaxies, the temperature in space is generally considered to be 2.725 Kelvin which is -454.72°F (-270.4°C). This is only a very small amount above absolute zero, the coldest possible temperature at which the movement of all matter ceases at -459.67°F (-273.15°C).
funbox
reply to post by SecretKnowledge
the moment she says -o yeah that's true. the blue box? there pooping up all over the place in that segment.there is a dam # piece of footage , machinery somewhere is creating the vertical waves you see , there's so much exposure problems im not even going to begin analysing this piece of crap. shame on the whole space program for producing such mediocre footage , another tipped hat to great documentation of our space endeavours. nasa should go see Hollywood and borrow some staff.. o erhhem
funBOx
funbox
reply to post by JadeStar
an entry level canon would provide sharper footage, what are you on about "my entertainment" , don't you feel that a lot could be gained from quality footage? how about spacewalk procedures , adequately filmed they would provide invaluable training footage , and a multiple of other reasons less not, high quality footage of the blood impacts of a micrometeorite passing through a working astronaut and other such rare events. science needs to up its image , high quality footage would do that considerably
chunderingBox
SecretKnowledge
reply to post by JadeStar
So what do you reckon attaches itself at 2:54 in the video?