It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Human0815
reply to post by InTheLight
Regarding the big Quake at the 3/11
Seismic Construction Standards. The Fukushima 1 Daiichi plants were built to withstand peak ground acceleration of 0.18 g's. At the earthquake epicenter at a distance 110 miles away, peak ground acceleration reached 0.35 g's. Peak acceleration at the plants has not been reported.
----
At the Daini plant, ground accelerations ranged from 186 gal in the vertical plane at unit 1 to 277 gal from north to south at unit 3, as recorded by sensors in the reactor building foundation. The range of design basis figures is a spread from 415 gal to 512 gal.
At Daiichi there is still no data for units 1, 2 and 5, but available figures put the maximum acceleration as 507 gal from east to west at unit 3. The design basis for this was 441 gal. Other readings were below design basis, although east-west readings at unit 6 of 431 gal approached the design basis of 448 gal.
Fault zone acceleration. The world's biggest nuclear power plant had been built on an earthquake fault line that generated three times as much as seismic acceleration, or 606 gals, as it was designed to withstand, the utility said. One gal, a measure of shock effect, represents acceleration of 1 centimeter (0.4 inch) per square second.
Just the additional Info:
Sourceedit on 20-11-2013 by Human0815 because: info
cartenz
reply to post by InTheLight
So far so good at Fuku??? Are you on crack? the whole Pacific ocean is now contaminated, thats not really "so far so good" unless you have the agenda to kill us all.
How's the health plan at GE? will they cover you for leukaemia?
Its not like you are going to answer me as you have yet to address any of my questions thus far.
InTheLight
cartenz
reply to post by InTheLight
So far so good at Fuku??? Are you on crack? the whole Pacific ocean is now contaminated, thats not really "so far so good" unless you have the agenda to kill us all.
How's the health plan at GE? will they cover you for leukaemia?
Its not like you are going to answer me as you have yet to address any of my questions thus far.
Do you have reading and comprehensive issues? ...Quote by me "so far so good at Fukushima" - meaning the decommissioning happening now. Did you miss the above post re: Germany buying nuclear power from France and others?
The point here is not whether we need nuclear power. It is whether the nuclear industry in Britain is learning from disasters. Is it coming clean about all the risks associated with the venture?
Hiroshi Minami, Japan's chief negotiator, said that with no nuclear power, Japan has to lower its "ambition level" on greenhouse gases. In the short term, Japan is trapped, as are we all, in a vicious circle of greenhouse gas dependency and worsening climate change.