It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
theantediluvian
This is simply not true. Do you deny that there is a cause or do you believe that it's being fought by non-progressives?
beezzer
Free speech should be free. Just look at the Westboro Baptist threads where people are all for banning what they said. I think Westboro are idiots.
beezzer
"That offends me."
The phrase, "That offends me", is at the heart of the matter. Isn't it?
Is PC designed to protect those that are offended?
Since when did being offended constitute victimhood?
theantediluvian
They're examples of defense mechanisms of conservative ideology used to discredit liberalism.
beezzer
reply to post by Skyfloating
Phrases like "personal responsibility", "self-determination" are often bandied about here on ATS. I use them to justify or to support independence from government.
I also see these terms as an anathema to the progressive ideology because it negates a dependence to the state.
Do you suppose that is why groups like the Tea Party are branded as domestic terrorists, (American Taliban)?
The deeper agenda imo, is the idea that a human being is not inherently responsible for how he feels, what he does or says. He is a soulless being, without will or choice. One of the many prerequisites to install this ideology is to act as if it were not his choice whether he is offended by words or not, as he were not responsible for his obesity, as if guns kill people, not humans, etc. Seeing the human as a soulless automaton of the collective or choice-less animal is the underlying agenda imo. The end-result is dis-empowerment of the average individual...for the benefit of whoever happens to be in power
The totalitarian arbiters of PC are not smart enough to realize that suppressing free thought does not get rid of unwanted thoughts, it amplifies them.
beezzer
Phrases like "personal responsibility", "self-determination" are often bandied about here on ATS. I use them to justify or to support independence from government.
I also see these terms as an anathema to the progressive ideology because it negates a dependence to the state.
Do you suppose that is why groups like the Tea Party are branded as domestic terrorists, (American Taliban)?
Aliensun
reply to post by Skyfloating
I disagree with your premise. PCness was the first effort to make us all "equal" or "just as good as the next person no matter individual differences of any kind, sex, race or disability or ability.
That line of reasoning has been changed to "Diversity" being the new rule.
beezzer
reply to post by darkbake
During the government shut-down, Tea Party candidates were called hostage takers and terrorists for their ideological beliefs.
In our PC world, there are just a few sub-groups that can still be defamed and insulted.
JohnnyCanuck
This thread doesn't seem to take into account either the value of good manners, or the apparent need for many who lack them, to find excuses for...or to celebrate...their shortcoming.
TheConstruKctionofLight
I respectfully suggest that by limiting or focussing on the Soviet/US cold war mindset you fail to get to the more insidious nature of the beast.
JohnnyCanuck
This thread doesn't seem to take into account either the value of good manners, or the apparent need for many who lack them, to find excuses for...or to celebrate...their shortcoming.
darkbake
Political correctness does not keep people from thinking anything, especially if it is something they can see for themselves. It only keeps those people from speaking their views in public.
What does this mean? It means that they are going to take their views underground, where they are going to polarize, because there is no interaction with other viewpoints, and then they are going to become dangerous. That's right, political correctness leads to dangerous and hidden cells of racists, sexists and more, that are off the radar.