posted on Nov, 14 2013 @ 10:45 PM
Go one step further - what is the true purpose of the bible? how much do you know, or understand of its history? let alone its implications on modern
geo-political development, and the ascension of empire through the facade of religion?
A bride of Lucifer? Heh. Are ye a Freemason? Ashkenazi? I don't see why you would think that Solomon was a real person, anyway? Exodus is quite
clearly something other than 'the Jews escaping slavery'. el o el.
tell me, lover of Lucifer, en-light-en meeee. >
What happens on Nov 28th? Who knows - I have never made any public predictions; I have never had enough evidence to really warrant such an attempt for
attention - however - the numbers I interpreted without any bias whatsoever seems to point to the 28th. But -- I don't really care! lol -- man- you
people are too jaded; spend some time off ATS - perhaps you have had your fill of lunatics and doom-sayers - and are projecting onto others whom
merely wish to share information- if you aren't interested in numbers, just say so! To deny that there are curious synchronizations which are rather
easily drawn from the Solomon texts indicate something is meant - a mason never places something because 'it looks nice'. =)
Does the Juwes/Solomon connection not interest you either? ...Then why are you here? lol. These people..
I find it peculiar how those wishing to share information come under such bitter scrutiny - no real interest, aside from poking holes in the
information offered - subsequently a reason why I have made so few threads --- there is little reward for sharing information, that I&I can see.
I mean - you would think I had thought of something such as the Gregorian calendar and its implementation..?
The date 'November 28th' is not important -- how I came to this date was by searching for calindrical occurrences which corresponded to a 70 000
year cycle, the same with the number 80 000 - 3600 is an obvious orbital time -
the numbers 'working' suggested by Solomon's temple are preposterous - nobody needs 153 600 people working on a temple - let alone would there be
that much skilled labour!
I'm beginning to think you are just mental.... Or maybe drunk. Who knows.... I asked you what YOU felt the true purpose of Solomon's key was.
You replied "It points to Nov. 28." Maybe you need a reminder?
Now you try to say "Nov. 28th is not important." Dude, you are all over the board. And you STILL haven't answered my first question (providing
you are now denying your original reply).
What is the purpose of the Bible? Well...depends who you ask. Looks to me like it has several purposes. It is a doctrine of power for established
institutions. To the general Christian (or Judaic) masses, it is a moral compendium for societal and personal values. And yet to others, it is
something more still. I'm sure the list goes on and on... What does that have to do with the price of rice in China?
Am I a Freemason? Well...being a woman....I cannot be a Freemason. And Lucifer....yeah, I am humbled to bear the helix of the 'Light Bringer.'
Meaningless to you...so why pull it into the thread unless you are that desperate for a deflection?
Do I think Solomon was a real person? Yes, I do. In fact, I know that Solomon was a real person.... And I have the feeling you wouldn't understand
Solomon's Key, texts, or anything else he built, used, or created in this world, even if it bit you in the @$$.
So through your disjointed rantings I'm assuming you think that the texts of Solomon are some secret code tied to Masonry and you are making
propounded numerical associations akin to someone tripping acid to support your (loosely termed) "theory"? All pointing to a date (albeit from a
calendar that didn't even exist in the times of Solomon) that isn't really important at all?
And because you asked, I took an interest in your thread because I thought you might put forward something academically interesting or debatable.
Afterall, despite your Helen Keller attempt at numerology, there are some parts to Gematria that the skeptic in me can appreciate rising above the
level of common coincidence.