posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 12:15 PM
Your "debunking" source is a fanciful but entirely baseless jumble of unsubstantiated horsecrap. Looking at some of your recent threads I had been
considering that you might know what you're talking about. Now I know better. I can see why folks might want this case to be fake, but I'm unconvinced
by the efforts. Just my opinion of course.
I normally would have ignored any post that dogged me about that because I posted the source and folk can take it or leave it.
Since it was you, however, and I hadn't read it in awhile, I figured I better go back and read it again to make sure I still felt it was solid.
After rereading, I still feel that it makes a good case and certainly knocks some glaring and huge holes in aspects of the whole thing. It's not
definitive, I agree, but, imo, extremely damaging and detailed enough.
If I hadn't respected your opinion I wouldn't have reread it. I still respect your opinion, but we disagree on this one.
Now A Note to CryonicAngel: I see now that you made no claims about Hellyer's credibility, you just pointed out that he was one of the highest-ranking
believers. Sorry I kind of bounced hard!!
edit on 13-11-2013 by The GUT because: (no reason given)