It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

*very* mysterious mound in Russia. a cone where no cone should ever be!

page: 5
84
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 03:00 PM
link   
Could the weight of the heap, say if dumped from helicopters as mentioned, cause so much pressure on the surface that a sink hole could have opened up underneath causing the odd formation?

And what about those doom porn/alien vids where there is a cylindrical 'thing' seen flying into volcanoes?




posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 03:05 PM
link   
considering the print thats been left there its almost like a big spaceship landed there in search of minerals?




posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 03:08 PM
link   

MysterX
reply to post by freestonew
 


Tunnel boring machine.

It came up, creating the crater, then for some reason went back down creating the mound in the middle...then stayed there, just under the surface becoming the mysterious cylindrical object.

But...250 years ago?

Is it possible that the Russians had an as yet unknown dabble with early tunnel boring machines (TBM's)?



It is actually funny you mention this possibility because another poster mentioned concerning the mystery of very deep cylindrical holes carved in rocks which you can not see the ending of while looking at it.

What is mind boggling if this were to be true, a tunnel boring machine, it would mean that some stuff is happening deep underground while we are not being told about it.

What does not fit the picture is the fact that it is dated 250 years ago!


Something is very mysterious about this whole thing I must admit.




Thruthseek3r



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 03:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 

Char-Lee, I see your point, and I too have visited many hot spots in the US but from what I can see in the provided photos, it sure does look like it was hydro formed. Have you seen the size of boulders moved by raging rivers? Imagine an explosive water jet? Big boulders? No problem. It does look like there was some water runoff on the downsides of the mound. It's hard to tell exactly without visiting the site. We don't know how old it is, or how much the signs of an immense water runoff may have been eroded away, by wind snow, and rain, leaving only larger rocks, and heaviest silts.

edit on 13-11-2013 by zayonara because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 03:43 PM
link   

thruthseek3r

MysterX
reply to post by freestonew
 


Tunnel boring machine.

It came up, creating the crater, then for some reason went back down creating the mound in the middle...then stayed there, just under the surface becoming the mysterious cylindrical object.

But...250 years ago?

Is it possible that the Russians had an as yet unknown dabble with early tunnel boring machines (TBM's)?



It is actually funny you mention this possibility because another poster mentioned concerning the mystery of very deep cylindrical holes carved in rocks which you can not see the ending of while looking at it.

What is mind boggling if this were to be true, a tunnel boring machine, it would mean that some stuff is happening deep underground while we are not being told about it.

What does not fit the picture is the fact that it is dated 250 years ago!


Something is very mysterious about this whole thing I must admit.




Thruthseek3r


Well actually those holes don't keep going...
From jtma508 post...www.abovetopsecret.com...



On this pictures people go down to one of such holes but it just finishes with nothing.



It almost seems like samples, huge core drill samples are being taken from earth. They seem to be often in areas teeming with microbial life. Maybe someone is replenishing their planet like space craft.

As far as this OP subject I am about ready to go with something similar to, or "The Caldrons" as they are thought to rise and goes back under the surface in very out of the way places.



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 03:51 PM
link   

jtma508
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


How about the reports of the odd, circular bore holes located in remote areas in Russia/Siberia? What struck me about those reports was the lack of excavated material. Where did it go? Is it possible it was transported here by helicopter and dumped?

Mystery Holes in Russia


I am sorry I nearly repeated everything you said, for some reason I was thinking you was speaking of the ones in peru.
That is what happens when we fail to check peoples links.
Unexplained Band of Holes near Pisco Valley in Peru
blog.world-mysteries.com...





posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 04:11 PM
link   

zayonara
reply to post by Char-Lee
 

Char-Lee, I see your point, and I too have visited many hot spots in the US but from what I can see in the provided photos, it sure does look like it was hydro formed. Have you seen the size of boulders moved by raging rivers? Imagine an explosive water jet? Big boulders? No problem. It does look like there was some water runoff on the downsides of the mound. It's hard to tell exactly without visiting the site. We don't know how old it is, or how much the signs of an immense water runoff may have been eroded away, by wind snow, and rain, leaving only larger rocks, and heaviest silts.

edit on 13-11-2013 by zayonara because: (no reason given)


There are a few points beyond the lack of silt type material and type of stone.




and the area is considered to be fully non-volcanic – there are no volcanoes around for thousands of kilometers, even old and extinct ones.

The crater seems to be “new”. Its rock has is not even overgrown with moss. Scientists believe the crater could be 100-500 years


Geysers are formed in thin crust where there has been previously volcanic action.
Also wow that would be some HUGE guyers, have you been to Yellowstone?




posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 04:19 PM
link   

theclarificator55555

freestonew
hi all.

on englishrussia.com, I found this blog post and the link.

englishrussia.com...

yet another mystery in the deep Siberia lands. Alien artifact, ancient cultures, or soviet recent secret-stuff?!

I present this all to you all....freestone





Looks for me like the debris from the twin towers just left there.
BTW, I don't believe in the mound age, it is just an incoherent assumption, no old pics, you don't know if this debris from 9/11 was recently poured, so in that case the surrounding trees ages are pointless.
For the people asking how you transport 130,000 tons of debris from USA to Russia this is simple:
First Experimental Teleportation of material. Wouldn't be safe to teleport useless debris instead of a human being in their first experiment ever of this kind? Sorry... no aliens involvement here.



edit on 1111 13 1313 by theclarificator55555 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Very few threads recently have secured my total interest, this one did just that... I honestly wonder what that could be, the reason? Who did this? Natural? So many unanswered questions.. I hope they get to the bottom of this. I also wonder if they would do some type of archaeological dig there??? You obviously don't want to ruin the site, but an investigation to what it is should definitely happen sooner than later...



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 04:36 PM
link   
Never heard of this, so good find. And also good job for having a picture... Since Tunguska case and even Yakutsk get mixed here, I will say that:

- Firstly this looks like a crater and nothing more, it could be radioactive but it just looks natural, I doubt there is anything unnatural about it.

Tunguska explosion is widely considered to be a meteorite event, by other sources especially about ET, it is considered to have been a case of battle between extraterrestrials or even a case where Pleiadeans cigar shaped ship was destroyed by some of the malovelent races thus the explosion.

Yakutsk and the Cauldrons are what mostly interests me about mysteries in Russia (and some other cases like the expedition of hikers or scientists found dead with burned bodies in the snowy (Caucasian/Ural) mountains is too disturbing to even show any interest).

So in this crater they took pics from the air, from place. My question is, WHY DIDN'T they fly over Yakutsk, the Death Valley? If various health issues occur on the ground why don't they go and take pictures of these cauldrons from the air like they do with this crater? Maybe unlike this crater it was just a myth?



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by ImpactoR
 





If various health issues occur on the ground why don't they go and take pictures of these cauldrons from the air like they do with this crater? Maybe unlike this crater it was just a myth?


The last expedition believed they found that they have sunk in swamp so there would really be nothing to see from the air if that were so. These places are so hard to get to no one seems to want to go as you can't take much with you so it makes work investigating pretty rough.



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


Yes I have been to Yellowstone four times. Yes it would have to be a huge geyser. Maybe it originated from very very deep. Was there mention of accelerated growth in the vicinity? Water?

Could it have been a natural gas explosion triggered by lightning?



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by zayonara
 


Well it might have been an Hydrothermal Explosion.

pubs.usgs.gov...



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 05:41 PM
link   
interesting close up's





posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 05:57 PM
link   
reply to post by haven123
 


Anyone have coordinates for Google Earth? If its on there (which would also give at least some idea of how long it's been there from the date the GE scan was done).

As for the Band of Holes in Peru, that has always really freaked me out! Anyone have any good informative or theory links for those?



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 06:13 PM
link   
reply to post by haven123
 


thank you all.

I have a few of my own observations, from being a "country boy"!

----those rocks in the above photo, look "tormented" they were not liquefied in high heat, like deep underground mountain roots are. the rocks look like they were subjected to immense pressure.

---wilderness. in a cold climate any man-made tracks, diggings, scratches, will be there for many years.
I see none.

--looks recent, as they argue.

---limestone-looking rock. not a place for volcanics.

----looks a bit like "someone/something made a crater from below and then came back and added to it, from below. thus that bulge.

no 9/11 dumpings. dumpings from another mine by air? 250 years ago?

I sense the vastness of the forest. This is Alone.

one of the expedition leaders got very dizzy and then sick. no one else did.
I read that for some of the tourists to the Egypt great pyramid; they enter and then get very dizzy and have to be rescued. In other wods, there is some type of "Etheric" energy being emitted here that only affects certain people. this implies an "emitter"!

perhaps one might study the lat and longitude of this crater and then see if this spot alines with worldly ley lines and power points!

freestone



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 06:13 PM
link   
reply to post by haven123
 


The bottom one looks almost like a petrified bubble, could this have been a high tempereture object or beam that liquified the rock and earth and that took gas in with it only for the rock to then solidify and crack parially through the bitter cold of the siberian winters.
very interesting geology indeed.



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by haven123
 


Beautiful, I can just picture the lava bubbles puffing up and hardening as another forms inside reheating the whole over and over...where is that? Looks like Hawaii. I know these form under water there.
edit on 13-11-2013 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 06:26 PM
link   

NewtonDKC
reply to post by haven123
 


Anyone have coordinates for Google Earth? If its on there (which would also give at least some idea of how long it's been there from the date the GE scan was done).

As for the Band of Holes in Peru, that has always really freaked me out! Anyone have any good informative or theory links for those?


You can search by Patomskiy Krater and you will find it.
The crater magically disappear on 2004, there is no a glimpse of it.
The myth of Siberian scientists saying it was discovered on 1949 it just part of the disinformation and pure lies.
They yet have a supposed old picture about this mound that is fake, just being photo-enhanced to appear as it were old, here: siberiantimes.com...

So much cover in terms of this mound.
Wikipedia history only register this mound fake-dated history in 2012.

Looks for me like the debris from the twin towers just left there.
The debris from 9/11 was recently poured, so in that case the surrounding trees age theory is pointless.

For the people asking how you transport 130,000 tons of debris from USA to Russia this is simple:
First Experimental Teleportation of Material.

Wouldn't be safe to teleport useless debris instead of a human being in their first experiment ever of this kind?

edit on 1111 13 1313 by theclarificator55555 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2013 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by theclarificator55555
 


Unless it dissapeared because, a the planter over it to hide it or b they dug up whatever was under it and then planted over it to hide it, so I consider the excavation to have taken place.
Good information thank you.



new topics

top topics



 
84
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join